Since it is pretty useless to know the amps without knowing what the source is and what they drive, here is my whole setup:

- Lexicon MC-1 Pre/Pro
- Arcam DV-88 DVD player
- EVo 200.2 amp for the fronts
- Anthem MCA-5 Series II amp for the rear, sides and center
- Newform Research R645 fronts, R630 rears
- M&K Surround-200 MkII sides
- Soundline Audio SL6-5 center channel
- SVS 16-46CS Subwoofer
- Silversonic and Nordost cables, monster power regulator

I am pretty eager to see what the 950 will sound like... I currently am thinking about ditching the MC-1, so if the 950 is good enough it will stay, if not, I'll get the MC-12 and keep the 950 as a "gap" preamp - for these situations where I have a hole in my system while upgrading something - maybe I'll get a separate pre-amp just for music, who knows. But, let's get back to the amps.

The Bel Canto is *AWESOME* musically, it really works well with the R645, the soundstage is amazing. BUT, it won't hide anything coming from upstream, so much that is why I am ditching the MC-1; it just isn't that good for music - it is great for home theater but I now want something that has support for progressive signal for video switching and analog bypass so I can use the DAC in the Arcam (which is very good musically) without involving the pre/pro. I just hope that the 950 analog path is pretty neutral.

I use my setup for a lot of movies, about 4-6 DVDs a week... I am a very "visual" person so, during a movie, I tend to focus more on the picture than on the quality of the sound so I loose track of the "system" itself fairly quickly - could be because the sound is so good. What really gives me a hard on though, is listening to classical music; whoaaa, It's all about hearing the silence baby! The Bel is awesome for music, but I could not afford to have all channels with that. I guess you have to choose your battles.

I think Bel Canto now have a 6 channel unit but as a downside, they are fairly expensive. However, I am VERY impressed with the Anthem, I wonder why they are not getting more positive press, they make a great product all around - it sure makes the Bel look cheap... I compared the MCA-5 to a Bryston 9B-ST THX in direct A-B comp and to me the Anthem just sounded better and was also cheaper (can't beat that), the Bryston has a better design from a power supply standpoint but real-life, I could not hear it, even when driving the system hard. Anthem now have a 7 channel unit, the PVA-7 - that would fit perfectly for a 7.1 setup. If money was no object, I would have 7 Bel Canto's in mono configuration ;-)

I have never heard the Outlaw amps, I learned of the company after I bought the Anthem so I never gave them a shot - I definitively would have since they have a money back trial period. The fact that the 950 is going to be tuned with their amps *could* also be a plus. I listened to Aragon, Parasound, Bryston, NAD, Linn and Anthem. I really wanted to listen to Acurus, Proceed and Odyssey amps but could not find them when I was ready to buy, the Anthem turned out great anyway. Meridian, Levinson and Krell were out of my range. The Bel was an impulsive buy, I wanted to see what the hype was about (no comments please).

I must admit it sounds pretty good so far so I probably won't make many changes for a while except on the pre-pro side - I am still trying to find the *elusive* perfect dual purpose home theater AND music setup...

Don't forget to take the speakers into account in your choice since their power rating, their senitivity and the listening level you intend to drive your system at can have an effect on what you will choose for the amp. Do not overlook the power source and the cables - no need to go esoteric but home depot zip cord can't really be considered seriously.

That is why it is so hard to get a good system together, there are WAY too many variables and, past a certain point, it is VERY subjective. Comments are always welcome.

But enough ranting, I never expected this to be that long.

Good luck,

T.

[This message has been edited by tcouture (edited January 04, 2002).]

[This message has been edited by tcouture (edited January 04, 2002).]

[This message has been edited by tcouture (edited January 04, 2002).]

[This message has been edited by tcouture (edited January 04, 2002).]

[This message has been edited by tcouture (edited January 04, 2002).]