Originally Posted By: Kevin C Brown
One sub. The ongoing wisdom has been that if you have a dedicated means of EQ'ing the sub: SMS, Velodyne DD, AS-EQ1, RABOS, etc; use that first, then use Audyssey over top of that.
That scenario works because the response of the subwoofer doesn't change due to interacting with another subwoofer.
Originally Posted By: Kevin C Brown
So now with two subs, Audyssey can do a better job alone w/o first EQ'ing each sub individually?
Not a question of better or worse, but what is being EQ'd. If you EQ each subwoofer independently, when they'll never be heard that way, then you're EQing the wrong thing (and wasting your time). That would be like EQing a subwoofer in the middle of the room, where it is easier to get a flatter response, then placing it in the corner where it is going to reside before EQing it again. Why bother with the first round of EQing when no one is going to hear the sub from the middle of the room? Likewise, why EQ each sub independently when no one will ever hear it that way.
Originally Posted By: Kevin C Brown
When EQ'ing two subs together is a lot more difficult than one sub by itself ... specifically due to their interaction?
Why is it more difficult? You measure the bass response, and minimize the peaks and dips as best you can. What difference does it make how many subs are physically connected to the EQ?
Originally Posted By: Kevin C Brown
If each sub is EQ'ed individually first, Audyssey is given a more uniform response to start with, to then EQ the combined response.
That uniformity disappears the moment you turn on both subwoofers. Try it for yourself and see.
_________________________
Sanjay