"As for differences in the units, that is up to the individual manufacturers to decide. As for the pricing difference, anyone that knows the Outlaw Story understands that it is unfair to compare the price of our goods to those of other traditional companies. Our direct M to C (manufacturer to consumer) model enables us to eliminate an entire level of mark up (specifically, dealer mark up)."

Unfair to whom? The dealer I would assume. As the squeeze on the dealer continues, I think mark-ups continue to erode. At least that is what people in the know (dealers) have been telling me.

I really don't think the intent of the article was to harm anyone or being unfair for that matter. It appears to me (excepting the erroneous price info admittedly) that the intent was to show what direction the industry may be heading.

I guess my question is aimed at Scott-did you take it the article was unfair?