First, charlie
from charlie :
A PC in my media room isn't appealing at all. A networked appliance (I think they're being called "media hubs") that can go to a remote (in a closet someplace) media server and display/play content located on that server is very appealing. ...
That's the idea, that the house has a main server/computer room with its storage there but shared via network (ethernet or wireless 802.11g or better)to other rooms. So a case like this:
would easily fit in your rack. It's standard width and then all you have to do is connect it to your home network and access all your stored media from the server. Now I'm not that sure about 'media hubs'. They all seem to require a PC somewhere in the connection process, so your still getting a PC.
Now gonk,
from gonk:
... I think that even with the plummetting cost of hard drives we're not quite there yet for storing complete movie libraries ...
Don't be so sure. Do you know how many companies are offering
Media Center PCs? All the big boys are doing it, and you can get a Terabyte of storage for around $600 and the prices will easily be dropping by year end. Sony released a home server with 1 TB of storage in October 2004.
(source) As well, most motherboards have
SATA I or
II in them for easily making a
RAID array yourself of a Terabyte or more.
1,000 Gigabytes or storage, should easily handle most of today's needs. Sure,
Blu-ray and
HD-DVD will start pushing that at a max of
120 GB for
HD-DVD with eight layers, and
Blu-ray being
10GB more per layer, maxing at
200 GB. But the industry, though they have it already working, are not going to release four layer until 2007 and eight layer by mid 2008 or 2009.
Now, they may start releasing their higher formats earlier with
HVD coming fairly soon with
3.9 TB storage capability. But anyway, movies do not need that much storage at
1080p resolution. True,
HDMI cables currently won't handle the bandwidth frequency needed for
1080p with audio signal, but
DVI-D can take care of the video needs of
1080p, and that's a standard out of current video cards for any PC.
Now something to note though, is that these PCs can do multiple displays, so Outlaw may want to incorporate more than one
DVI video out connection, for those who would want to have their movie/TV on one screen (the big one) and their desktop on another. But as well, the user can just use the existing
DVI out to go to their desktop monitor. So it's not a necessity.
Still, sure I like playing graphic intensive games at
1600x1200 (4:3) or
2100x1600 (16:9), but
1080p res,
1920x1080, is not that far away from it, so I'd like to see a computer game on my
80" front projection screen or even just surf the web that way. And, I'm guessing many others out there don't have that many different desires than me.