Outlaw Audio home shop products hideout news support about
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#80992 - 03/24/09 11:12 PM 997 DAC's
gooomz Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 02/28/06
Posts: 258
Loc: new york
anyone have any info on which DAC's the 997 will have?

an upgrade over the 990 DACs?

thanks

Top
#80993 - 03/24/09 11:22 PM Re: 997 DAC's
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
Not anything that I can find.
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#80994 - 12/11/09 06:27 AM Re: 997 DAC's
wetcoast Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 11/22/09
Posts: 6
Loc: Canada
Bump?

I'm interested to know. The new Onk's and Integras are 32/192k and if the 997 isn't I don't think I'm gonna wait anymore.
_________________________
Polk LSi25, LSiC, LSiFX, Klipsch Sub-12, Sunfire Grand Cinema Signature 400 Seven, Denon AVR-886, Motorola DCT-6416 x 2, PS3 250GB Slim, Sharp LC-60E77UN, APC S15 Power Conditioner

In the market for a new Pre/pro
On the way Maelstrom X 18" DIY sub tuned to 17 Hz

Top
#80995 - 12/11/09 12:58 PM Re: 997 DAC's
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
"32/192k"? Not 24/192k? I've not heard about that. Is the processor upsampling as well?
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#80996 - 12/11/09 07:21 PM Re: 997 DAC's
Jimna Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 10/07/09
Posts: 236
Loc: Denver, CO
i dont see the point. no source matieral is available at that bit rate, nor will any. and what advantage would this make, added headroom only matters in the mastering process? i dont get it...
_________________________
J.Mimna Photography
Live Concert Recordist

Outlaw 970>
Emotiva XPA-2>
Martin Logan Preface

Some Of My Live Recordings: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/J.Mimna

My Concert Photographs: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimna/collections/72157613267633153/

Top
#80997 - 12/11/09 10:49 PM Re: 997 DAC's
XenonMan Offline
Desperado

Registered: 04/08/08
Posts: 2676
Loc: Columbus,North Carolina
Please explain the DAC numbers. I was under the understanding that the sampling frequency was the 192 KHz and the output limit was the bit level as the exponent of 2 (2 to the 24th power). It would seem that as long as the sampling frequency was greater than or equal to the original imprint, the sound would be output faithfully. I always thought anything over the original was oversampling. Please correct my thoughts on this.
_________________________
Music system
Model 990/7500/Magnepan 1.6 QRs/Technics SL1200 MK2/Aperion S-12 Subwoofer/OWA3/Sony NS75H DVD
APC H15 Power Conditioner

TV System
Large Advent Loudspeakers/ Polk center/Monoprice surrounds/Panasonic Viera 42 inch/Onkyo HT-RC260/Sony BDP S590/Directv


Home Theater System
Onkyo PR-SC886/Outlaw 7125 Klipsch RF-82 L/R,RC-62 center, RB-35 SR/SL, BENQ HT1075, Outlaw LFM1-EX/OPPO BDP-83/Directv
Harmony ONE
Blue Jeans and Monoprice interconnects
APC H15 Power Conditioner

Top
#80998 - 12/11/09 11:03 PM Re: 997 DAC's
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
I would not assume that these DAC's are going to automatically mean better sound quality than a 24-bit/192kHz DAC. For one thing, there is no 32-bit source material and I can't find much online to explain what practical benefit the extra bits provide when dealing with 16-bit and 24-bit signals. For another thing, the overall design of the analog circuit is very important - two separate implementations of the same DAC can (and frequently will) sound different.
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#80999 - 12/12/09 12:36 AM Re: 997 DAC's
wetcoast Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 11/22/09
Posts: 6
Loc: Canada
I've understood that 24 vs. 32 bit means that there are more levels of sound volume.

So if a dial had fixed detents from 0-10 with a detent every 1 a higher resolution would have 20 or 30 detents enabling a finer adjustment.

I though I would ask the question because the Onkyo companies have chosen to upgrade their DAC's and the 997 hasn't been completed yet for approximately the same money (adjusted for brand equity) I would figure the 997 would include this feature.
_________________________
Polk LSi25, LSiC, LSiFX, Klipsch Sub-12, Sunfire Grand Cinema Signature 400 Seven, Denon AVR-886, Motorola DCT-6416 x 2, PS3 250GB Slim, Sharp LC-60E77UN, APC S15 Power Conditioner

In the market for a new Pre/pro
On the way Maelstrom X 18" DIY sub tuned to 17 Hz

Top
#81000 - 12/12/09 05:06 AM Re: 997 DAC's
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
Not really volume. More bits of resolution means that an analog signal is broken into smaller pieces, but that is the greatest benefit comes from the analog-to-digital process (when you take that analog source and convert it to digital). Your CD's are 16-bit no matter what your DAC can do. You can get 24-bit from DVD-Audio and Blu-ray. You aren't going to get a 32-bit source. I would be curious to know what the practical benefits of a 32-bit DAC are. Barring some sort of upsampling to 32-bit, I am just not sure what value exists (aside from perhaps marketing hand-waving).

The hardware design for the 997 and R-972 was probably finalized quite a while ago. If it has any similarities to the Model 990's analog section, it will use a Cirrus DAC. I don't know that Cirrus has a 32-bit DAC yet, and I'm sure they didn't when the R-972 hardware design was finalized. TI's Burr-Brown brand appears to have started offering a 32-bit DAC pretty recently. Since Onkyo was already using Burr-Brown DAC's, it was probably easy to switch over when they developed the new model year.
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#81001 - 12/12/09 07:10 AM Re: 997 DAC's
Jimna Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 10/07/09
Posts: 236
Loc: Denver, CO
the more bits per sample the more accurately it can be processed. but again with no source material available then its a lost cause. if they are dithering to the higher bit-rate that process alone can cause more problems than its worth, i just dont see the point. im not even sure i would want that in any gear i own.
_________________________
J.Mimna Photography
Live Concert Recordist

Outlaw 970>
Emotiva XPA-2>
Martin Logan Preface

Some Of My Live Recordings: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/J.Mimna

My Concert Photographs: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimna/collections/72157613267633153/

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 79 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Hedoboy, naowro, BeBop, workarounder, robpar
8705 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
Forum Stats
8,705 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,326 Topics
98,691 Posts

Most users ever online: 476 @ 12/28/22 08:54 PM