#49531 - 06/18/01 10:20 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Chatham, Ontario, Canada
|
I have never used a DSP since I have been in the hobby. Keep the menus simple.
------------------ ----- Jeff Sheeler eh!
_________________________
----- Jeff Sheeler eh!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49532 - 06/18/01 10:44 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Fairfax, VA
|
Thumbs down. I like to check the difference in sound between the modes but invariably always revert back to the original. It is not a necessity but if it can be added at no cost then it should be incorporated.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49533 - 06/18/01 10:46 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
|
If there's any chance that it'll increase Outlaw's sales, given that nothing else will suffer, I'd include them. I'm not likely to use them, though.
Lary
[This message has been edited by Lary Larson (edited June 18, 2001).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49534 - 06/18/01 10:47 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
|
Actually, if it will not degrade the performance of "more serious" DSPs, then why not? A dedicated processor should be feature rich.
_________________________
Sam
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49535 - 06/18/01 10:49 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Lagrange Park, IL USA
|
No thanks on additional DSP modes. Even though you will be supplying discreet codes for the Pronto, I don't see any reasons for offering them on this type of equipment. People who like them usually are the types that shop only at Best Buy for recievers and they feel like they get more "bang for their buck" by having them available.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49536 - 06/18/01 10:52 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 04/09/01
Posts: 3
|
Please just say "NO" to DSP!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49537 - 06/18/01 10:53 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 16
Loc: worcester,MA
|
Thumbs down on other DSPs if DPLII works as advertized
_________________________
Kef Reference 203 R/L, Reference 202c center, Kef Q15 surrounds,Kef Q100 rear surrounds, Velodyne VLF-1012 sub, Krell Showcase pre/pro, Krell 2250 Amplifier, Lexicon CX-5 amplifier, Sanyo Z5 projector, Oppo BD-83SE Blu-Ray player, Luxman PD121 turntable, PS Audio GCPH phono preamp
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49539 - 06/18/01 10:56 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Torrance, CA, USA
|
Thumbs Up to dsp's. It's better to have than not.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49540 - 06/18/01 11:27 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 04/09/01
Posts: 8
Loc: ft. worth, tx
|
I vote NO for DSP modes. DPLII is worth including, but after that, nothing is necessary besides a nice two channel analog pass through.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
68
Guests and
3
Spiders online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
8,714 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,330 Topics
98,700 Posts
Most users ever online: 677 @ 09/27/24 06:41 PM
|
|
|
|