Outlaw Audio home shop products hideout news support about
Page 16 of 45 < 1 2 14 15 16 17 18 44 45 >
Topic Options
#49531 - 06/18/01 10:20 AM Re: The Great DSP Debate
Jeff Sheeler Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Chatham, Ontario, Canada
I have never used a DSP since I have been in the hobby. Keep the menus simple.

------------------
-----
Jeff Sheeler
eh!
_________________________
-----
Jeff Sheeler
eh!

Top
#49532 - 06/18/01 10:44 AM Re: The Great DSP Debate
gregor1 Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Fairfax, VA
Thumbs down. I like to check the difference in sound between the modes but invariably always revert back to the original. It is not a necessity but if it can be added at no cost then it should be incorporated.

Top
#49533 - 06/18/01 10:46 AM Re: The Great DSP Debate
Lary Larson Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
If there's any chance that it'll increase Outlaw's sales, given that nothing else will suffer, I'd include them. I'm not likely to use them, though.

Lary

[This message has been edited by Lary Larson (edited June 18, 2001).]

Top
#49534 - 06/18/01 10:47 AM Re: The Great DSP Debate
Sam_D Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Actually, if it will not degrade the performance of "more serious" DSPs, then why not? A dedicated processor should be feature rich.
_________________________
Sam

Top
#49535 - 06/18/01 10:49 AM Re: The Great DSP Debate
GarryW Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Lagrange Park, IL USA
No thanks on additional DSP modes. Even though you will be supplying discreet codes for the Pronto, I don't see any reasons for offering them on this type of equipment. People who like them usually are the types that shop only at Best Buy for recievers and they feel like they get more "bang for their buck" by having them available.

Top
#49536 - 06/18/01 10:52 AM Re: The Great DSP Debate
crazyray Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 04/09/01
Posts: 3
Please just say "NO" to DSP!

Top
#49537 - 06/18/01 10:53 AM Re: The Great DSP Debate
jgambino Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 16
Loc: worcester,MA
Thumbs down on other DSPs if DPLII works as advertized
_________________________
Kef Reference 203 R/L, Reference 202c center, Kef Q15 surrounds,Kef Q100 rear surrounds, Velodyne VLF-1012 sub, Krell Showcase pre/pro, Krell 2250 Amplifier, Lexicon CX-5 amplifier, Sanyo Z5 projector, Oppo BD-83SE Blu-Ray player, Luxman PD121 turntable, PS Audio GCPH phono preamp

Top
#49538 - 06/18/01 10:56 AM Re: The Great DSP Debate
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
I'll toss in my "no thanks" for the "extra" DSP modes. I never used them on my Yamaha, and I haven't used them on my 1050.

If they are included, it'd be good for the interface to keep them somewhat "out of the way" so you don't need to stumble past them to get to something else.

REVISED: I still don't want the extra DSP modes (I'm thinking of DPLII as a separate issue, that is very valuable), and I'd really like not having to skip through them to get from 2-channel to DPLII or the DD/DTS surround mode and back to 2-channel. At the same time, though, there may be a real danger to leaving them out entirely -- complete omission may be a weakness in some consumers' and reviewers' eyes. As some others have said here, a reviewer (or a consumer) very often may have a checklist of "standard" options that includes DSP modes. I'd hate to see Outlaw lose business because they aren't there. I'd also prefer to be able to completely forget they're there if I don't want to use them (perhaps a separate category/control for them?).


[This message has been edited by gonk (edited June 20, 2001).]
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#49539 - 06/18/01 10:56 AM Re: The Great DSP Debate
Dennis O Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Torrance, CA, USA
Thumbs Up to dsp's. It's better to have than not.

Top
#49540 - 06/18/01 11:27 AM Re: The Great DSP Debate
george king Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 04/09/01
Posts: 8
Loc: ft. worth, tx
I vote NO for DSP modes. DPLII is worth including, but after that, nothing is necessary besides a nice two channel analog pass through.

Top
Page 16 of 45 < 1 2 14 15 16 17 18 44 45 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 117 Guests and 3 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Hedoboy, naowro, BeBop, workarounder, robpar
8705 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
patm1198 1
Helson 1
Forum Stats
8,705 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,326 Topics
98,691 Posts

Most users ever online: 476 @ 12/28/22 08:54 PM