#91025 - 07/19/12 02:41 AM
Re: Who Did It?
[Re: 73Bruin]
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 07/23/06
Posts: 26
Loc: Oakland, CA
|
Bain Capital? I can think of a whole bunch of jokes about that possibility. Might not be funny though.
_________________________
Oppo BDP-83SE Outlaw 990 Jolida 801A (Stereo Unlimited mod) Antique Sound Lab AV-25 (three) Magnepan 1.6 (Stereo Unlimited mod) LR Magnepan MC1 surrounds Opera (mod) center AMC subwoofer (mod) Panasonic 65VT50
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#91033 - 07/19/12 10:33 AM
Re: Who Did It?
[Re: akiddoc]
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 02/28/02
Posts: 128
Loc: Euless, Texas, USA
|
Just a guess, but I'd have a hard time believing it was D&M, only because I'd be surprised if Outlaw would still offer Marantz products if that were the case. Maybe I'm wrong.
Edited by legivens (07/19/12 10:37 AM)
_________________________
Main room Epson 5025UB 120" Visual Apex fixed screen Outlaw Model 7900 Outlaw Model 5000 (for the ceiling speakers) Marantz AV7702 MK2 Oppo BDP-105D Axiom M80's, GoldenEar Super XXL, GoldenEar Aon 3's (sides and rears), GoldenEar HTR 7000's (in-ceiling for Atmos/DTS:X) Outlaw LFM1-Plus and EX Directv HD DVR 2 HD Monster Power centers PS3 Harmony One
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#91036 - 07/19/12 11:55 AM
Re: Who Did It?
[Re: legivens]
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 12/20/02
Posts: 194
|
Technically D&M Holdings no longer exists. It is now D+M Group and they are headquartered in New Jersey not Japan.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#91040 - 07/19/12 03:17 PM
Re: Who Did It?
[Re: gonk]
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 12/20/02
Posts: 194
|
Yep after reading some of M Codes postings over at AVS I agree gonk.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#91041 - 07/19/12 05:36 PM
Re: Who Did It?
[Re: gonk]
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 09/06/03
Posts: 11
Loc: St. Louis MO
|
I got an email this morning from a friend with the same thought -wondering what company he should be boycotting now. I'd be surprised if we ever know, as I don't see Outlaw ever offering up the name. Long time lurker, seldom poster here... I disagree. This will become public information, and sooner rather than later, what with the internetz and all. The PR shitstorm that follows will be exactly the kind of "free market solution" that results from cutting a "competitor" off at the knees. I'm also in the camp that thinks the 978 platform surfaces in the domestic Chinese market inside 6 months. This is not a knee-jerk xenophobic reaction, but simply a reading of the complete disregard they have for IP rights. How the eff does Outlaw get shutout without so much as design rights?
_________________________
And now, some suggestive scenes of jets refueling...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#91042 - 07/19/12 05:52 PM
Re: Who Did It?
[Re: nurhaci]
|
Desperado
Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
|
I disagree. This will become public information, and sooner rather than later, what with the internetz and all. The PR shitstorm that follows will be exactly the kind of "free market solution" that results from cutting a "competitor" off at the knees. Informing customers why a long-awaited product has been killed was something that Outlaw really had to do, but outright including the names of all the other players could interfere with future business for Outlaw. Sure, the announcement from Outlaw may trigger a series of events that identifies all those other players, but that is part of the "free market solution" (to borrow the term) that Outlaw can quite reasonably say isn't due to their actions. By refusing to offer the names, Outlaw takes the high road, in a manner of speaking. That can benefit them in other business negotiations. I'm also in the camp that thinks the 978 platform surfaces in the domestic Chinese market inside 6 months. This is not a knee-jerk xenophobic reaction, but simply a reading of the complete disregard they have for IP rights. How the eff does Outlaw get shutout without so much as design rights? You may well be right. In fact, you probably are. It is likely that the factory would choose not to use the platform (or at least any obviously recognizable parts of it) for North American or European products, but it is very possible for something sold domestically in Asia to be derived from this design. As for the last question, I think you've already answered your own question. They might have grounds to call in the legal counsel and file a lawsuit in Chinese courts, but no realistic hope of getting any meaningful concessions from the effort. Writing it off as a painful lesson and walking away may be the most fiscally responsible course of action.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#91043 - 07/19/12 08:26 PM
Re: Who Did It?
[Re: gonk]
|
Desperado
Registered: 11/13/02
Posts: 336
Loc: Illinois
|
From a purely generic contract law / intellectual property rights stand point the circumstances could have gone down the same way with US based contract manufacturing partners. Of course the details of if / how / where the "still borne" product could see the light of day for a US firm are a whole lot different due to , among other things, the long history of these sorts of cases being litigated . I seem to recall that men back to Eli Whitney and Alexandar Graham Bell were involved in these kinds of controversies... China is eons behind in that regard, and may have reason why they never really want to "catch up" to courts in the West. Frankly even firms like Siemens, Nokia, Alcatel and other Euro-Zone firms have legal separations for their US divisions for largely political reason back home.
The thought occurs to me that with the current unemployment situation, the wind down of activities related to high tech military electronics that were rushed into production to support Iraq and Afgahanistan which should free up skilled electronics assemblers in California , as well as the favorable rates for business investment that there should be more opportunies to "on shore" certain consumer electronics activities. It would great if Outlaw could work the "proud to be made in the USA" angle into a viable future offering....
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#91045 - 07/19/12 10:10 PM
Re: Who Did It?
[Re: renov8r]
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 09/06/03
Posts: 11
Loc: St. Louis MO
|
... The thought occurs to me that with the current unemployment situation, the wind down of activities related to high tech military electronics that were rushed into production to support Iraq and Afgahanistan which should free up skilled electronics assemblers in California , as well as the favorable rates for business investment that there should be more opportunies to "on shore" certain consumer electronics activities. It would great if Outlaw could work the "proud to be made in the USA" angle into a viable future offering.... And yet the dollar is stronger now than it's been in awhile, so while that's a pleasant thought, it will remain a pipe dream for all but the most boutique, cost-no-object brands.
_________________________
And now, some suggestive scenes of jets refueling...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#91046 - 07/19/12 10:57 PM
Re: Who Did It?
[Re: nurhaci]
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 05/24/02
Posts: 279
Loc: Mountain View, CA, USofA
|
First, when we are told: "This topic has been moved." we should be told to where is has been moved.
Second, and more important, in light of the recent shocking announcement about the model 978, we should be told what North American company put the pressure on the Chinese OEM and what is the name of that Chinese OEM who broke their contract with Outlaw.
The fact that neither was named makes me very suspicious. What? The names have been withheld to protect the guilty. Please don't tell me that legal issues prevent the disclosure of any names. I'm not going to believe you.
I am so very close to losing any sense of credibility with Outlaw ...
Paul
_________________________
the 1derful1
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
53
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,703 Posts
Most users ever online: 677 @ 09/27/24 06:41 PM
|
|
|
|