You obviously aren't trying to understand a single thing I've said. All this information is available to you and easy to look up and research. Please use google or ask audyssey.
And why would DSX EVER need to listen to a signal in 3D to calculate room reflections from given speaker locations. This is crazy. You don't mount the speakers in any location. You get out your tape measure and place them as close to the required angles of listening as possible. + or - 10 degrees for all locations will work. Please go to ask audyssey and do a little research there please. I have done this with Trinnov. And to say Trinnov in an outlaw will perform as good as their 13,000 dollar computer is a bold statement. A comparison will only be able to tell so let's throw that assumption out the door for now.
It's very amazing that audyssey can't know yet it does. Wow
I'm coming to find out you're impossible to talk to as you don't take the time to educate yourself in these matters.
And how is changing the original signal ever superior to treating your room. Some treatments are just impractical. I would rather hear All frequencies if possible in the intended original material. When did I ever state you should not have an eq. You are pathetic in your attempts of disecting what I'm saying because you are losing focus on what it is that the talking points are. My focus is 7.2 versus 11.2. Not eq which is your specialty (defending an eq system that doesn't exist yet without glitches on the Sherwood), not 5.1 versus 7.1 blurays (Which have been matrixed many times but only mentioned because 11.2 DSX can create all those channels from even 5.1 as well as introduce discrete 7.1 if available), not room treatments. I don't care what you think about these things because I have done my research which you should do. If you don't like the idea of DSX tell us why but don't claim that what it does is impossible and don't use me as your main reference. Please don't waist my time anymore please.