You quoted one of the very few things DSX is not good at reproducing.
I quoted a description of what DSX processing sounds like, turning a single voice into a "chorus effect". Not saying it's good or bad, not telling you to like it or not, just pointing out what the processing does.
Not many movies have the voice of god effect.
The voice of god effect that Brent Butterworth described is simply dialogue that's been steered into the L/R channels, which happens on many Pixar films when characters move across the screen. The effect may be easier to hear on vocals, but it will happen to other sounds as well, whether it is drum whacks that panned across the soundstage or a car that drives from left to right. So it doesn't matter how many movies have the voice of god (vocals in the L/R channels), because DSX will create the same effect with any sounds that are in those channels.
Not you who has no experience with it and discredits everything it claims to be able to do
I have experience with it and so can anyone else. For around $1k, you can buy a used Onkyo 1009 from a retailer with a solid 30-day return policy, like Amazon. The 9 amp channels built-in allow you connect heights and wides. You can then instantly compare DSX to PLIIz to Neo:X on a system that you are familiar with (your system) in a room that you know well (your room) using as much material as you want (including revealing test tracks) over the course of a few weeks. Aside from the cost of return shipping, there's no reason anyone else can't do the same comparison I did.
You sound very unintelligent to me.
Still resorting to ad hominem attacks. If someone has a different opinion of DSX than you, why do you take it so personally?