Outlaw Audio home shop products hideout news support about
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#80992 - 03/24/09 11:12 PM 997 DAC's
gooomz Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 02/28/06
Posts: 258
Loc: new york
anyone have any info on which DAC's the 997 will have?

an upgrade over the 990 DACs?

thanks

Top
#80993 - 03/24/09 11:22 PM Re: 997 DAC's
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
Not anything that I can find.
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#80994 - 12/11/09 06:27 AM Re: 997 DAC's
wetcoast Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 11/22/09
Posts: 6
Loc: Canada
Bump?

I'm interested to know. The new Onk's and Integras are 32/192k and if the 997 isn't I don't think I'm gonna wait anymore.
_________________________
Polk LSi25, LSiC, LSiFX, Klipsch Sub-12, Sunfire Grand Cinema Signature 400 Seven, Denon AVR-886, Motorola DCT-6416 x 2, PS3 250GB Slim, Sharp LC-60E77UN, APC S15 Power Conditioner

In the market for a new Pre/pro
On the way Maelstrom X 18" DIY sub tuned to 17 Hz

Top
#80995 - 12/11/09 12:58 PM Re: 997 DAC's
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
"32/192k"? Not 24/192k? I've not heard about that. Is the processor upsampling as well?
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#80996 - 12/11/09 07:21 PM Re: 997 DAC's
Jimna Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 10/07/09
Posts: 236
Loc: Denver, CO
i dont see the point. no source matieral is available at that bit rate, nor will any. and what advantage would this make, added headroom only matters in the mastering process? i dont get it...
_________________________
J.Mimna Photography
Live Concert Recordist

Outlaw 970>
Emotiva XPA-2>
Martin Logan Preface

Some Of My Live Recordings: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/J.Mimna

My Concert Photographs: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimna/collections/72157613267633153/

Top
#80997 - 12/11/09 10:49 PM Re: 997 DAC's
XenonMan Offline
Desperado

Registered: 04/08/08
Posts: 2676
Loc: Columbus,North Carolina
Please explain the DAC numbers. I was under the understanding that the sampling frequency was the 192 KHz and the output limit was the bit level as the exponent of 2 (2 to the 24th power). It would seem that as long as the sampling frequency was greater than or equal to the original imprint, the sound would be output faithfully. I always thought anything over the original was oversampling. Please correct my thoughts on this.
_________________________
Music system
Model 990/7500/Magnepan 1.6 QRs/Technics SL1200 MK2/Aperion S-12 Subwoofer/OWA3/Sony NS75H DVD
APC H15 Power Conditioner

TV System
Large Advent Loudspeakers/ Polk center/Monoprice surrounds/Panasonic Viera 42 inch/Onkyo HT-RC260/Sony BDP S590/Directv


Home Theater System
Onkyo PR-SC886/Outlaw 7125 Klipsch RF-82 L/R,RC-62 center, RB-35 SR/SL, BENQ HT1075, Outlaw LFM1-EX/OPPO BDP-83/Directv
Harmony ONE
Blue Jeans and Monoprice interconnects
APC H15 Power Conditioner

Top
#80998 - 12/11/09 11:03 PM Re: 997 DAC's
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
I would not assume that these DAC's are going to automatically mean better sound quality than a 24-bit/192kHz DAC. For one thing, there is no 32-bit source material and I can't find much online to explain what practical benefit the extra bits provide when dealing with 16-bit and 24-bit signals. For another thing, the overall design of the analog circuit is very important - two separate implementations of the same DAC can (and frequently will) sound different.
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#80999 - 12/12/09 12:36 AM Re: 997 DAC's
wetcoast Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 11/22/09
Posts: 6
Loc: Canada
I've understood that 24 vs. 32 bit means that there are more levels of sound volume.

So if a dial had fixed detents from 0-10 with a detent every 1 a higher resolution would have 20 or 30 detents enabling a finer adjustment.

I though I would ask the question because the Onkyo companies have chosen to upgrade their DAC's and the 997 hasn't been completed yet for approximately the same money (adjusted for brand equity) I would figure the 997 would include this feature.
_________________________
Polk LSi25, LSiC, LSiFX, Klipsch Sub-12, Sunfire Grand Cinema Signature 400 Seven, Denon AVR-886, Motorola DCT-6416 x 2, PS3 250GB Slim, Sharp LC-60E77UN, APC S15 Power Conditioner

In the market for a new Pre/pro
On the way Maelstrom X 18" DIY sub tuned to 17 Hz

Top
#81000 - 12/12/09 05:06 AM Re: 997 DAC's
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
Not really volume. More bits of resolution means that an analog signal is broken into smaller pieces, but that is the greatest benefit comes from the analog-to-digital process (when you take that analog source and convert it to digital). Your CD's are 16-bit no matter what your DAC can do. You can get 24-bit from DVD-Audio and Blu-ray. You aren't going to get a 32-bit source. I would be curious to know what the practical benefits of a 32-bit DAC are. Barring some sort of upsampling to 32-bit, I am just not sure what value exists (aside from perhaps marketing hand-waving).

The hardware design for the 997 and R-972 was probably finalized quite a while ago. If it has any similarities to the Model 990's analog section, it will use a Cirrus DAC. I don't know that Cirrus has a 32-bit DAC yet, and I'm sure they didn't when the R-972 hardware design was finalized. TI's Burr-Brown brand appears to have started offering a 32-bit DAC pretty recently. Since Onkyo was already using Burr-Brown DAC's, it was probably easy to switch over when they developed the new model year.
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#81001 - 12/12/09 07:10 AM Re: 997 DAC's
Jimna Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 10/07/09
Posts: 236
Loc: Denver, CO
the more bits per sample the more accurately it can be processed. but again with no source material available then its a lost cause. if they are dithering to the higher bit-rate that process alone can cause more problems than its worth, i just dont see the point. im not even sure i would want that in any gear i own.
_________________________
J.Mimna Photography
Live Concert Recordist

Outlaw 970>
Emotiva XPA-2>
Martin Logan Preface

Some Of My Live Recordings: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/J.Mimna

My Concert Photographs: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jimna/collections/72157613267633153/

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 1100 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
audio123, Dustin _69c10, Dain, REP, caffeinated
8717 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
The Wyrm 3
FAUguy 2
butchgo 2
kiwiaudio 1
Forum Stats
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,708 Posts

Most users ever online: 1,034 @ 41 minutes 50 seconds ago