While looking for the thread that I was thinking of, I came across
this thread in which bestbang4thebuck made a really good post on this topic:
Originally posted by bestbang4thebuck:
Q: If you were not bi-amping, how would you balance the channels? A: You wouldn't. Both the high frequency and low frequency input sections of the crossover are tied together and receiving the same level of signal. The crossover designers have already put in any attenuation necessary to bring the more efficient/sensitive parts of the multi-driver system down to match the less efficient/sensitive parts of the system.
Q: If you're passive bi-amping and feeding both the high frequency and low frequency input sections with the same level of signal, how would you balance the channels? A: You wouldn't. You're still using the all the passive crossover elements and the crossover designers have already put in any attenuation necessary to bring the more efficient/sensitive parts of the multi-driver system down to match the less efficient/sensitive parts of the system.
This works if you are reasonably certain that each channel being used already has the same amount of gain.
Bestbang4thebuck also had a similar post in
this thread (which I think was the one I was thinking of).