Outlaw Audio home shop products hideout news support about
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#7728 - 06/22/03 04:36 PM Using the ICBM in my H T system
wmeckle Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 05/21/03
Posts: 6
Loc: Phoenix Arizona USA
Hi Gang:
Check the following URL for usage of the ICBM unit in my home theater system:
http://www.wmeckle.com/System.jpg
Anyone want to have the interconnect cable
concession ?



------------------
Bill Eckle
abuse@wmeckle.com
Vanity Web page at:
http://www.wmeckle.com
_________________________
Bill Eckle
abuse@wmeckle.com
Vanity Web page at:
http://www.wmeckle.com

Top
#7729 - 06/22/03 04:55 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
soundhound Offline
Desperado

Registered: 04/10/02
Posts: 1857
Loc: Gusev Crater, Mars
I checked out your DIY page. Some fine looking cabinets! I also noticed you have a lot of Altec Lansing stuff there. I used to work for them when they were in Anaheim, CA, and had a blast there. So many things to play with I use A7-500s as my main fronts, although they have been pretty heavily tweaked, and are run bi-amplified with an external crossover at 1.2Khz.

As for your interconnects, you might try these:

http://ubb.outlawaudio.com/ubb/Forum14/HTML/000069.html

Top
#7730 - 06/22/03 05:29 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
D'Arbignal Offline
Desperado

Registered: 02/23/03
Posts: 327
Loc: NJ, USA
If memory serves, A.L. has an office near me at the NJ/PA border.

Jeff

Top
#7731 - 06/22/03 05:30 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
D'Arbignal Offline
Desperado

Registered: 02/23/03
Posts: 327
Loc: NJ, USA
P.S. I concur: those are some fantastic cabinets!

Jeff

Top
#7732 - 06/22/03 05:49 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
soundhound Offline
Desperado

Registered: 04/10/02
Posts: 1857
Loc: Gusev Crater, Mars
Jeff:

I think the professional division of Altec has risen from the ashes somewhat and is in Oklahoma City, OK. When they went belly up in Calif, they moved there only to be gobbled up by Electro-Voice. Then they were bought by somebody else. The consumer division is nothing but the name. It's a real shame. I used to love rummaging through their "museum" collection which was basically the history of modern sound reproduction right there for me to play with. The factory itself was real old school workmanship. They had a metal shop supervisor from Germany who trained in the "old world" way. One thing he told me is that students were handed a chunk of metal and a file, which they had to transform to a precise cube of a certain dimension within close tolerances. He built me some chassis and faceplates that would bring tears to your eyes.

Top
#7733 - 06/22/03 07:56 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
wmeckle Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 05/21/03
Posts: 6
Loc: Phoenix Arizona USA
Quote:
Originally posted by soundhound:
I checked out your DIY page. Some fine looking cabinets! I also noticed you have a lot of Altec Lansing stuff there. I used to work for them when they were in Anaheim, CA, and had a blast there. So many things to play with I use A7-500s as my main fronts, although they have been pretty heavily tweaked, and are run bi-amplified with an external crossover at 1.2Khz.

Hi Soundhound:
25 years ago I had a 4 channel system using 4 Altec A7s. Ahead of my time ?
As for your interconnects, you might try these:
Actually, I make all my interconnects, Neglex 4 conductor mic cable ($.63 per ft.) and RCA plugs from Milstek ($2.08 each).
Thanks for the tip though.
I've also started using the THX coding scheme for interconects, makes it easier to follow and trace in a complex system.
Left front = Red
Right front = Blue
Center = Green
Left rear = White w/red tracer
Right Rear = White w/blue tracer
Sub (LFE) = Black


http://ubb.outlawaudio.com/ubb/Forum14/HTML/000069.html
_________________________
Bill Eckle
abuse@wmeckle.com
Vanity Web page at:
http://www.wmeckle.com

Top
#7734 - 06/22/03 08:14 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
soundhound Offline
Desperado

Registered: 04/10/02
Posts: 1857
Loc: Gusev Crater, Mars
I've used the Neglex in my studio for mic runs. For my own equipment projects, I use BNCs instead of RCAs. The crimp BNC is really easy to terminate onto RG59.

I've been playing with the idea of constructing an infinite baffle cabnet for my mains using the Altec 416 8B driver. I would probably keep the cabinet volume about the same as the A7 cabinet so as not to raise the resonant frequency of the woofer too much. I cross over now to my subs (four 18" JBLs) at 60Hz with a 4th order Linkwitz-Riley. I would want to keep the woofer offset to the rear of the cabinet so the physical alignment with the horn wouldn't be uspset. Any thoughts on this?

Top
#7735 - 06/22/03 08:41 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
wmeckle Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 05/21/03
Posts: 6
Loc: Phoenix Arizona USA
Quote:
Originally posted by soundhound:
I've used the Neglex in my studio for mic runs. For my own equipment projects, I use BNCs instead of RCAs. The crimp BNC is really easy to terminate onto RG59.

Hi Soundhound:
I'd prefer BNCs also, but it is too late to convert everything now, also the BNC sockets are too large to fit on most later home components.

I've been playing with the idea of constructing an infinite baffle cabnet for my mains using the Altec 416 8B driver. I would probably keep the cabinet volume about the same as the A7 cabinet so as not to raise the resonant frequency of the woofer too much. I cross over now to my subs (four 18" JBLs) at 60Hz with a 4th order Linkwitz-Riley. I would want to keep the woofer offset to the rear of the cabinet so the physical alignment with the horn wouldn't be uspset. Any thoughts on this?


E-Mail me to: soundhound@wmeckle.com and I'll reply with an Altec factory bulletin attached that details the Xover hook up depending on the offset of the horn to woofer.
Don't think you'll have any problems with a 60 HZ Xover and a 5 or 6 cu. ft. sealed box. Easy to measure the Fb rise though.
_________________________
Bill Eckle
abuse@wmeckle.com
Vanity Web page at:
http://www.wmeckle.com

Top
#7736 - 06/24/03 05:50 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
Spiker Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 05/29/03
Posts: 297
Loc: Middle Earth
Hey wmeckle,
nice work on your speaker cabinets. I too have done DIY speaker projects and have been enjoying the higher quality and value over store bought ones. I believe it will do a lot of good to convince other Outlaws about the benefits of DIY and kit speakers. Most of Outlaw fans if not all, have something in common. It is to get quality audio products at competitive price. Perhaps a coherence can be achieved from electronic signals (pre-amp) to air vibrations (driver cone) if they delve into DIY or kit speakers. I was a bit nervous and skeptical about building my own speakers at the beginning. Once I started to see my friends' reaction to my home built speakers versus their store bought ones, I knew my effort was well worth it. They were upset that mine sound better than theirs and I've spent less. What about the custom finish options? Will the name brands even give that kind of option at a competitive price? I doubt it.

Here's what I would say to other Outlaws. Give DIY and kit speakers a serious consideration. See the link page and look up Madisound, Parts express, Acoustic visions & Adire audio.

What is your opinion on home built speakers wmeckle?

Top
#7737 - 06/24/03 06:57 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
wmeckle Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 05/21/03
Posts: 6
Loc: Phoenix Arizona USA
What is your opinion on home built speakers wmeckle?[/B][/QUOTE]

Hi Spiker:
When I started designing and building speaker cabinets it was because lusted after speakers I couldn't afford, so if I wanted that quality, I had to learn to DIY.
Now later I prefer to build my own cabinets, I can get EXACTLY what I want in the trade off between size, shape and finish.
Kits seem to be dead and DYI seems to be dying. Too bad, lots of satisfaction in designing and bulding your own, besides the knowledge gained.
_________________________
Bill Eckle
abuse@wmeckle.com
Vanity Web page at:
http://www.wmeckle.com

Top
#7738 - 06/24/03 07:37 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
soundhound Offline
Desperado

Registered: 04/10/02
Posts: 1857
Loc: Gusev Crater, Mars
And don't forget one huge benefit of DIY speakers: it is easy to step up to active bi-amplification with an external electronic crossover and amps. At this level you can select amplifiers that complement the frequencies to be amplified among other things. Performance in this realm goes way beyond what you can get with even the most costly "store bought" HT gear.

Top
#7739 - 06/25/03 07:47 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
row1x Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 03/09/03
Posts: 20
Loc: Rockford, IL USA
wmeckle, those are impressive cabinets!

Do you have any impression on the Thor kit that is offered by Madisound? I will be building my own cabinets.
Sorry to change the subject but I wanted to ask.

Top
#7740 - 06/25/03 08:12 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
wmeckle Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 05/21/03
Posts: 6
Loc: Phoenix Arizona USA
Quote:
Originally posted by row1x:
wmeckle, those are impressive cabinets!

Do you have any impression on the Thor kit that is offered by Madisound? I will be building my own cabinets.
Sorry to change the subject but I wanted to ask.


Hi row1x:
I read the write up on the Thors in AudioXpress, and they appeared to be a lot like my Aria5s, so no changes are likely.
I haven't heard any speakers under $3,500 per pair that I'd trade for my Aria5s.
_________________________
Bill Eckle
abuse@wmeckle.com
Vanity Web page at:
http://www.wmeckle.com

Top
#7741 - 06/26/03 04:31 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
Joshorr Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 10/09/01
Posts: 50
Loc: Boston, MA
I have to say this is really inspiring to see such beautiful cabinetwork. I have been on the market for a sub woofer to be used 50/50 music/HT but I have been a little intimidated as to what kit I should choose. I know that I am handy enough to put some kit together although it would have to be pre-cut since I don’t have access to a good saw (just a drill, sander, pipe clamps and hand tools). As far as subwoofer design goes, what factors go into making a “good” product?

What makes a sub more “musical” versus good for HT (I assume if it is good “musically” and has enough output/range it will be good for HT too.)

Pro/cons of a sealed vs. vented box.

What impacts does the shape of the enclosure have on the sound (cube vs. rectangular) or is it just about the volume and the drive choice?

What are the pro/cons of having a passive radiator? Also what does the mass have to do with a PR?

Is it better to brace internally or to just beef up the cabinet itself i.e. thicker wood?

What do you do about an amp and controls if you choose not to use one of those plate amps?

So far I have been most interested in Acoustic Visions and Stryke Audio. In particular SA’s kit for the little brother of wmeckle’s brute force monster looks like fun. The other side of the coin is that I just say the heck with it and get an SVS or wait for the Outlaws’ LFM. I would imagine that some of these questions are ones that other fence riders like myself might have when it come to DIY subs. What are you thoughts, guys?




[This message has been edited by Joshorr (edited June 27, 2003).]

Top
#7742 - 06/26/03 05:47 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
wmeckle Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 05/21/03
Posts: 6
Loc: Phoenix Arizona USA
Quote:
Originally posted by Joshorr:
I have to say this is really inspiring to see such beautiful cabinetwork.
Thanks
I have been on the market for a sub woofer to be used 50/50 music/HT but I have been a little intimidated as to what kit I should choose. I know that I am handy enough to put some kit together although it would have to be pre-cut since I don’t have access to a good saw (just a drill, sander, pipe clamps and hand tools). As far as subwoofer design goes, what factors go into making a “good” product?
I don't have a table saw either, just a circular saw, router, drill, and clamps. There are numerous kits available on the Web
What makes a sub more “musical” versus good for HT (I assume if it is good “musically” and has enough output/range it will be good for HT too.)
HT subs are usually set much louder than music subs, this can be controlled in the newer DVD players with dual Bass Management settings. Music doesn't need super lows for thuds, car crashes etc. as a rule.
Pro/cons of a sealed vs. vented box.
It is hard to screw up a sealed box (mis-tune), sealed boxes usually play lower.
What impacts does the shape of the enclosure have on the sound (cube vs. rectangular) or is it just about the volume and the drive choice?
None, for subs, shape doesn't matter.
What are the pro/cons of having a passive radiator? Also what does the mass have to do with a PR?
Passives are used when there isn't room for a proper vent. They are tuned by the mass of the diaphragm.
Is it better to brace internally or to just beef up the cabinet itself i.e. thicker wood?
Since you're building it yourself, do both, when in doubt, add more "meat".
What do you do about an amp and controls if you choose not to use one of those plate amps?
There are many "stand alone" amps that have the features of a "plate" amp. And there are many electronic crossovers that have all the adjustments of a "plate" amp.
So far I have been most interested in Acoustic Visions and Stryke Audio. In particular SA’s kit for the little brother of wmeckle’s brute force monster looks like fun. The other side of the coin is that I just say the heck with it and get an SVS or wait for the Outlaws’ LFM. What are you thoughts, guys?

_________________________
Bill Eckle
abuse@wmeckle.com
Vanity Web page at:
http://www.wmeckle.com

Top
#7743 - 06/27/03 12:46 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
Joshorr Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 10/09/01
Posts: 50
Loc: Boston, MA
Thanks a lot Bill for you input. I also talked to Kyle at Aucoustic Vision (very helpful) and we put together a package that should more of less rival a SVS PC+ for about $200 less (and that with the unassembled enclosure; it would be an ever better deal if I could make my own). I now see how good the value can be,

Top
#7744 - 06/27/03 01:36 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
Spiker Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 05/29/03
Posts: 297
Loc: Middle Earth
Joshorr,
I believe you've made a good choice by ordering from Acoustic-visions. You will get a better value by doing it yourself. I've ordered mine from them and I've been happy with that decision. I see that you did it as I was writing my reply but I'll post it anyway FYI.

What makes a sub more “musical” versus good for HT (I assume if it is good “musically” and has enough output/range it will be good for HT too.)

- According to the experts, music sound rarely goes below 30 HZ whereas in movies there are sound effects that reach 20HZ or even below (inaudible but you can feel it) such as during an explosion scene. Generally, pricy subs ($500 and up) will do fine for both music and HT in an average size home. Cheaper ones may do ok for HT but can be boomy or sound muddy for music. It has to do with the quality of the driver (material, magnet, craftsmanship & …etc.) and or amplifier. Other cheaper ones may be ok for music but doesn’t have enough punch for that floor shaking rumble – the driver just can’t produce enough air movement or not enough power from the amp. Keep in mind, these are just generalized descriptions. There’s a lot of depth in acoustical engineering.

It all comes down to compatibility. If you have high-end electronics, you want to select a sub (and speakers) that can optimize the performance. Any less would be waste of money on electronics and any more would be waste on the sub.

Pro/cons of a sealed vs. vented box.

-Check out http://www.diysubwoofers.org/
For 50/50 music and HT, I’d personally use a large sealed enclosure, something like 5 cu ft or more with high power amp like Adire Audio’s A750 in combination with a driver like Tumult, Tempest or Shiva. That ought to give you a sweet bass in music and a chest pounding, wall picture tilting shake for movies.

What impacts does the shape of the enclosure have on the sound (cube vs. rectangular)

- Not much unless the shape starts to get real lengthy and compromises the strength of the enclosure. Although, I heard something about the “pipe effect” in a long shaped enclosure… I’m not worried because my sub is fairly close to a cube in proportion.

or is it just about the volume and the drive choice?

Internal volume and driver choice play a big role. Unless you have a good understanding of the enclosure calculations, I’d recommend using the ones that are already done such as the kits.

What are the pro/cons of having a passive radiator? Also what does the mass have to do with a PR? See above website or go to www.adireaudio.com and look up passive radiator design. Acoustic-visions has it too.

Is it better to brace internally or to just beef up the cabinet itself i.e. thicker wood?

Depends on the wood you are using. The most popular material to DIY projects are ¾” thick MDF (medium density fiberboard) which can be found at local Home Depot or stores alike. You can beef up the box itself and skip the bracing but it may end up weighing so much that you’ll need to put wheels on it or need a hand truck each time you try to reposition it. I’d would opt for internal bracing.


[This message has been edited by Spiker (edited June 27, 2003).]

[This message has been edited by Spiker (edited June 27, 2003).]

Top
#7745 - 07/02/03 02:53 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
Joshorr Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 10/09/01
Posts: 50
Loc: Boston, MA
Spider,
First, thank you so much for you great responce. DIYsubs.com is fantastic. It answered a lot of my questions. Now I have to play with that spreadsheet model to see how all the relationship work. But I do have a question for you. Your responce to my 50/50 music/HT usage was to use a sealed box. Now from most of the responce curves I have seem a sealed rolls off very gradually starting around 40-50 hz while a vented is realtively more flat down to its tuning point and then drops off fast (I think I said that right). What sonic qualities do you feel make up for the roll of a sealed (is that why you said a large enclosure to counter this)? Does room gain fit into this roll off better than a flat responce?

The way these kits can come everybody should make their own subs.

Top
#7746 - 07/02/03 07:42 PM Re: Using the ICBM in my H T system
Spiker Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 05/29/03
Posts: 297
Loc: Middle Earth
Quote:
Originally posted by Joshorr:
What sonic qualities do you feel make up for the roll of a sealed (is that why you said a large enclosure to counter this)?

Sealed subs are said to have the least amount of sound distortion compare to ported or PR. Nevertheless, if not designed properly, it can still have considerable distortion (quote from Kyle at Acoustic-visions). Generally speaking, because of it’s smoother transition towards lower frequency, its better for music. Keep in mind, there are exceptions among ported and PR subs. Also, with sealed sub, no need to worry about the port noise.

The larger enclosure was for HT purpose. By having a larger internal volume, it allows the roll off to occur at a lower point thus getting more rumble. Then again, there are exceptions such as REL and M&K. But do you really want to spend over $1,000 when you don’t have to? This is where DIY gets it’s role.

Quote:
Originally posted by Joshorr:
Does room gain fit into this roll off better than a flat responce?

In car audio design, I’ve been told that the difference is significant. The size of room, shape of room, placement of sub, furniture and room surface treatment all contribute to the performance of sub (and speakers). This is an area where most consumers including myself, will have a hard time fully comprehending. You may count on room gain but the amount you actually end up getting may be less than you desire. In other words, its unpredictable unless set in a room specifically designed for music or HT. Hope this answers your question. Try writing to someone like soundhound and see what he can add.

Quote:
Originally posted by Joshorr:
The way these kits can come everybody should make their own subs.

I’ve been trying to convince other outlaws on benefits of DIY subs and speakers but the response seem to be less than stellar. Perhaps you can write once you have your DIY sub and let those skeptical outlaws see the light.

Good luck.


Spiker

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 653 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
audio123, Dustin _69c10, Dain, REP, caffeinated
8717 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
The Wyrm 3
butchgo 2
FAUguy 2
kiwiaudio 1
Forum Stats
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,708 Posts

Most users ever online: 900 @ Today at 03:23 PM