#72834 - 03/26/07 11:58 AM
Is sub really necessary?
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 02/10/07
Posts: 130
Loc: Washington, D.C.
|
Home Theater Newbie question --
I am using a pair of B&W CDM 7NTs and will eventually get surrounds and a center speaker. In the meantime I'm using a pair of ADC 303AX's for surrounds and a KLH 17 for the center. Not great, but the old speakers, particularly the ADCs, are pretty good bookshelf speakers.
I have seen some discussion to the effect that, when you introduce a sub you set the front speakers to "Small," even if they are floor-standing. I assume that's to take the bass load off them and put it on the sub. But I'm already getting pretty good bsss from the B&Ws. In a small room, 11 X 17 with 9ft ceiling, will it be overkill to add a sub, even a small one?
Thanks, Bob
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#72836 - 03/26/07 02:00 PM
Re: Is sub really necessary?
|
Desperado
Registered: 03/20/03
Posts: 668
Loc: Maryland
|
Some folks that have a no-sub music system that they are, so far, very satisfied with, will add a sub as a supplement for the extreme lows and to give that ‘large space’ feeling when playing back a live event or similar content recording. By a supplement, I mean that no bass management is applied to the mains, and the top end of the crossover for the sub, either in the sub itself or in the processor, is set rather low, maybe 60Hz or 40Hz depending on the mains.
I prefer to apply bass management to both the mains and the sub outputs. I’ve never had a medium or large room for my audio gear, so my mains speakers aren’t all that big. As such, moving the crossover point up to 80Hz or 100Hz means that the woofers in the mains are free to more accurately handle frequencies above that point because the subs now carry all the low end – I say more accurately because the mains woofers aren’t trying to make the large excursions they would otherwise be trying to do when attempting large amplitude low frequencies from a small radiator.
Which brings me to some moving diaphragm theory for a moment. Reproducing high and low frequencies with the same diaphragm means that the high frequencies’ waveforms are ‘going for a ride’ on the lower frequency movements of the driver. This produces a mild modulated Doppler effect for the higher frequencies. Having two-way mains plus a sub is in essence dividing the reproduced frequencies into 3 bands. If those bands are theoretically 20-80 (two octaves), 80-1280 (four octaves), and 1280 to 20K (four octaves), then largest excursions required are made by the driver with the smallest ratio of low-to-high frequencies. This reduces that Doppler effect, a part of what is called inter-modulation distortion. If the mains are three-way and a sub is added, then ratio of the lowest-to-highest frequencies reproduced by one driver can be reduced even further.
As in all things audio, there are trade-offs. Most agree, however, that unless the mains speakers are truly exceptional, adding a subwoofer is a positive step.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#72837 - 03/26/07 02:01 PM
Re: Is sub really necessary?
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 12/28/06
Posts: 278
Loc: Outside Phila.
|
I vote yes for a sub. No question, if you like your movies to really go boom when the action starts, definitely get a sub. I love my ASW650.
_________________________
Model 1070 Toshiba HD-A35 & Pioneer BDP-51 Tivo Series 3 Elite 50" / Aquos 32" Squeezebox Radio
Stereo Setup: NAD C326BEE (50Wx2) Elite DV-47Ai Universal SACD/DVD-A Citypulse DA7.2x II + TXCO DAC B&W 685s JL Fathom F112 Denon AH-D2000 Headphones
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#72838 - 03/27/07 04:26 AM
Re: Is sub really necessary?
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 11/14/06
Posts: 3
Loc: Texas
|
I can live without a sub. I don't watch action movies often enough to benefit from a subwoofer.
I have to say, however, most people really like to hear/feel every last note and boom in the soundtrack. I really don't think a decent small subwoofer would be overkill in your case. You may be surprised at all the stuff your mains are not reproducing.
No slight to B&W intended, I might add. Fine speakers.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#72839 - 03/27/07 07:26 AM
Re: Is sub really necessary?
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 07/23/06
Posts: 274
Loc: Washington, DC
|
bestbang4thebuck, that was a great post. I had one of those no-sub music systems for 20 years. My Polk Audio RTA-12C speakers claimed to have a frequency response from 17 to 26khz. However, when I added a Sunfire True Subwoofer to the equation about 2 years ago, it was a very dramatic improvement. I did not necessarily hear things I never heard before (especially out of music CDs), but everything sounded better. So your moving diaphragm theory makes a lot of sense to me.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#72840 - 03/27/07 08:53 AM
Re: Is sub really necessary?
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 05/21/06
Posts: 195
Loc: Montréal,PQ
|
My chiropractor also believes in the benefits of a sub...if you sit on it...
_________________________
Outlaw 1070-Mirage M-290(main)+MCC(center)+Omnisat Micro(sides) nanosat(back)+ +PS12-90(sub)-Technics SL-5 turtable+Cambridge Audio 540P-HTPC - SamsungDTB-H260F HDTV tuner - Optoma HD 20 +100' Draper screen -lots of spaghetti and toys
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#72842 - 03/28/07 08:48 AM
Re: Is sub really necessary?
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 02/10/07
Posts: 130
Loc: Washington, D.C.
|
Thanks for the input, especially the setup advice. I am seriously considering a sub, but there are so many other neat toys I could add I wanted some help setting priorities.
Bob
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#72843 - 04/01/07 05:35 AM
Re: Is sub really necessary?
|
Desperado
Registered: 08/30/06
Posts: 425
Loc: NY
|
YES!!!!
_________________________
Outlaw 1070, Anthem MCA5 II amp. Sony Ps3 Alon 2 Mk2 Loudspeakers HSU VTF-2 Mk2 sub x2 VAC PA100/100 Tube Amp ARC SP16-L tube Preamp Audio Note Dac 2.1 "B" signature Furutech E-TP80, Ascend HTM-200, 340C Sony KDS-55A2020
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
979
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,708 Posts
Most users ever online: 1,171 @ Today at 03:40 AM
|
|
|
|