Outlaw Audio home shop products hideout news support about
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#72834 - 03/26/07 11:58 AM Is sub really necessary?
Bob Becker Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 02/10/07
Posts: 130
Loc: Washington, D.C.
Home Theater Newbie question --

I am using a pair of B&W CDM 7NTs and will eventually get surrounds and a center speaker. In the meantime I'm using a pair of ADC 303AX's for surrounds and a KLH 17 for the center. Not great, but the old speakers, particularly the ADCs, are pretty good bookshelf speakers.

I have seen some discussion to the effect that, when you introduce a sub you set the front speakers to "Small," even if they are floor-standing. I assume that's to take the bass load off them and put it on the sub. But I'm already getting pretty good bsss from the B&Ws. In a small room, 11 X 17 with 9ft ceiling, will it be overkill to add a sub, even a small one?

Thanks, Bob
_________________________
Robert S. Becker, Esq.
http://www.dcappeals.com
rbecker@dcappeals.com

Top
#72835 - 03/26/07 12:21 PM Re: Is sub really necessary?
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
The CDM 7NT is rated down to 40Hz (-3dB), which is certainly pretty decent, but there is material in movies that goes all the way down to (and often below) 20Hz. With no sub, that really deep bass is redirected to your fronts - where it is promptly lost in the response roll-off of the speakers.

I ran my system without a sub for a couple years or so (Paradigm Studio 60v2 mains that have a -3dB point pretty similar to your CDM 7NT's). When I finally added a subwoofer to the mix, the system was still in the living room of our old house (11'x19'x8'), and it was definitely a worthwhile upgrade. Adding a subwoofer will only be noticeable on certain types of music, but it will be a definite improvement with movies. Even if you only go with something small, like the LFM-2, it'll be a nice contribution to the system.
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#72836 - 03/26/07 02:00 PM Re: Is sub really necessary?
bestbang4thebuck Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/20/03
Posts: 668
Loc: Maryland
Some folks that have a no-sub music system that they are, so far, very satisfied with, will add a sub as a supplement for the extreme lows and to give that ‘large space’ feeling when playing back a live event or similar content recording. By a supplement, I mean that no bass management is applied to the mains, and the top end of the crossover for the sub, either in the sub itself or in the processor, is set rather low, maybe 60Hz or 40Hz depending on the mains.

I prefer to apply bass management to both the mains and the sub outputs. I’ve never had a medium or large room for my audio gear, so my mains speakers aren’t all that big. As such, moving the crossover point up to 80Hz or 100Hz means that the woofers in the mains are free to more accurately handle frequencies above that point because the subs now carry all the low end – I say more accurately because the mains woofers aren’t trying to make the large excursions they would otherwise be trying to do when attempting large amplitude low frequencies from a small radiator.

Which brings me to some moving diaphragm theory for a moment. Reproducing high and low frequencies with the same diaphragm means that the high frequencies’ waveforms are ‘going for a ride’ on the lower frequency movements of the driver. This produces a mild modulated Doppler effect for the higher frequencies. Having two-way mains plus a sub is in essence dividing the reproduced frequencies into 3 bands. If those bands are theoretically 20-80 (two octaves), 80-1280 (four octaves), and 1280 to 20K (four octaves), then largest excursions required are made by the driver with the smallest ratio of low-to-high frequencies. This reduces that Doppler effect, a part of what is called inter-modulation distortion. If the mains are three-way and a sub is added, then ratio of the lowest-to-highest frequencies reproduced by one driver can be reduced even further.

As in all things audio, there are trade-offs. Most agree, however, that unless the mains speakers are truly exceptional, adding a subwoofer is a positive step.

Top
#72837 - 03/26/07 02:01 PM Re: Is sub really necessary?
RedSIinPA Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 12/28/06
Posts: 278
Loc: Outside Phila.
I vote yes for a sub. No question, if you like your movies to really go boom when the action starts, definitely get a sub. I love my ASW650.
_________________________
Model 1070
Toshiba HD-A35 & Pioneer BDP-51
Tivo Series 3
Elite 50" / Aquos 32"
Squeezebox Radio

Stereo Setup:
NAD C326BEE (50Wx2)
Elite DV-47Ai Universal SACD/DVD-A
Citypulse DA7.2x II + TXCO DAC
B&W 685s
JL Fathom F112
Denon AH-D2000 Headphones


Top
#72838 - 03/27/07 04:26 AM Re: Is sub really necessary?
Toronado Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 11/14/06
Posts: 3
Loc: Texas
I can live without a sub. I don't watch action movies often enough to benefit from a subwoofer.

I have to say, however, most people really like to hear/feel every last note and boom in the soundtrack. I really don't think a decent small subwoofer would be overkill in your case. You may be surprised at all the stuff your mains are not reproducing.

No slight to B&W intended, I might add. Fine speakers.

Top
#72839 - 03/27/07 07:26 AM Re: Is sub really necessary?
garcianc2003 Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 07/23/06
Posts: 274
Loc: Washington, DC
bestbang4thebuck, that was a great post. I had one of those no-sub music systems for 20 years. My Polk Audio RTA-12C speakers claimed to have a frequency response from 17 to 26khz. However, when I added a Sunfire True Subwoofer to the equation about 2 years ago, it was a very dramatic improvement. I did not necessarily hear things I never heard before (especially out of music CDs), but everything sounded better. So your moving diaphragm theory makes a lot of sense to me.

Top
#72840 - 03/27/07 08:53 AM Re: Is sub really necessary?
Laventura Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 05/21/06
Posts: 195
Loc: Montréal,PQ
My chiropractor also believes in the benefits of a sub...if you sit on it... laugh
_________________________
Outlaw 1070-Mirage M-290(main)+MCC(center)+Omnisat Micro(sides) nanosat(back)+ +PS12-90(sub)-Technics SL-5 turtable+Cambridge Audio 540P-HTPC - SamsungDTB-H260F HDTV tuner - Optoma HD 20 +100' Draper screen -lots of spaghetti and toys

Top
#72841 - 03/27/07 12:10 PM Re: Is sub really necessary?
garcianc2003 Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 07/23/06
Posts: 274
Loc: Washington, DC
of course I would have never met my chiropractor until I had to lift the darn thing two flights of stairs. smile

Top
#72842 - 03/28/07 08:48 AM Re: Is sub really necessary?
Bob Becker Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 02/10/07
Posts: 130
Loc: Washington, D.C.
Thanks for the input, especially the setup advice. I am seriously considering a sub, but there are so many other neat toys I could add I wanted some help setting priorities.

Bob
_________________________
Robert S. Becker, Esq.
http://www.dcappeals.com
rbecker@dcappeals.com

Top
#72843 - 04/01/07 05:35 AM Re: Is sub really necessary?
Lizard King Offline
Desperado

Registered: 08/30/06
Posts: 425
Loc: NY
YES!!!!
_________________________
Outlaw 1070, Anthem MCA5 II amp.
Sony Ps3
Alon 2 Mk2 Loudspeakers
HSU VTF-2 Mk2 sub x2
VAC PA100/100 Tube Amp
ARC SP16-L tube Preamp
Audio Note Dac 2.1 "B" signature
Furutech E-TP80,
Ascend HTM-200, 340C
Sony KDS-55A2020

Top
#72844 - 04/28/07 09:16 PM Re: Is sub really necessary?
Alexandru Mihaita Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 04/17/07
Posts: 132
Loc: Springfield, PA
A sub is a good thing for movies, no matter how good the mains are. Floor standers are designed for music, where very seldomly you find anything below 40 Hz. Musical instruments just don't go that low, maybe organs...
For a smal to medium room, I fully hartedly recommend Sunfire Dominator 8, currently on sale for $450 at audioadvisor.com. Thay are extremely musical as well, their bass is tight and accurate and are very small. Thay are a superb value. They rattle the house with moovies and complement the mains for music very accurately.
_________________________
Alex

Top
#72845 - 04/28/07 11:59 PM Re: Is sub really necessary?
psyprof1 Offline
Desperado

Registered: 09/10/05
Posts: 443
Loc: Santa Barbara, CA
Point of fact: Mr. Mihaita is right that actual music hasn't very much content below 40 Hz, but that statement is about like saying that among all the music ever written not very much is by Bach or Beethoven. The fundamental of the lowest note on the piano is 27 Hz. Few piano scores include it, but any composer might agree it's nice to have it available, and a recording of a piece with that note, played on a concert grand piano, is going to be more convincing if the fundamental is audible on playback.
As for "maybe organs..." - yes indeed, organs. Bach used lots of pedal notes, especially for dramatic effect. I'm sorry for anyone who hasn't heard the Toccata and Fugue in D Minor and envious of any grownup who's hearing it for the first time, especially a live performance on a good instrument in a big space. (Talk about mind-blowing - !) And try listening to the beginning of "Also Sprach Zarathustra" (used in "2001") over a system that really lets you hear, as most theater sound systems of the time could not, that 32.7 Hz low C on the organ pedal.
Mr. Mihaita, I get Audio Advisor and maybe I've talked myself into following your advice on the Sunfire sub to go with my Magneplanars (lower limit 40 Hz).

Top
#72846 - 05/01/07 02:24 PM Re: Is sub really necessary?
Alexandru Mihaita Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 04/17/07
Posts: 132
Loc: Springfield, PA
I'm in total agreement with Mr. "psyprof1" (I'm sorry, I couldn't find the real name and be polite all the way) that my assessment about music carrying frequencies under 40Hz is rather quantitative than qualitative.
My intention was to say that audiophiles were happy with full-rangers for a long time, and the subwoofer in the home tends to be significantly more related to the home theater. Floor standers going down to 24Hz are fully capable of reproducing the fundamental of the lowest note of a grand piano, but they will fail (for they're not designed to) to reproduce the violent, coarse at times, sheer impact, low frequencies found in movies. LFE are a different animal, they're not music and have their definite role in home theater experience.
That's why I say "A sub is a must for home theater if the full impact of explosions and low frequency effects are to be had, but by no means a must for music, where good floor standers will shine". That's why it's difficult to find a good sub for music. Any sub can go "thump" and "boom", but by a large margin not all of them will be capable of a musical reproduction of the low frequencies.
When using the 1070 for music I can only imagine using analog inputs (coming from superior outboard DAC's) in stereo bypass mode, where the sub is out of the picture anyway and the mains are full rangers. Of course, 1070 may be used fed with digital signal for music as well, but then we're not talking audiophile grade DAC for the Cirrus Logic chip is not that.
_________________________
Alex

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 986 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
audio123, Dustin _69c10, Dain, REP, caffeinated
8717 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
The Wyrm 3
FAUguy 2
butchgo 2
kiwiaudio 1
Forum Stats
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,708 Posts

Most users ever online: 1,171 @ Today at 03:40 AM