�You REALLY should listen to the Linn Ninkas�. I�ll look them up on the web and see if I can find a local dealer (although my sales guy would be soooo disappointed�) I�m in the limited time boat for ranging far and wide. But I DO have 30 days. To be honest there are many many speakers that I hope I get to hear in the next years�now that I care. But some of these are mail-order only or just extremely hard to acess in limited time. And its not that I have not been listening (or have not had 'ears' even though not actively shopping. I still have a �sound� in my head I�m aiming for and if something besides the Beth. can better it by much�.I think I�ll faint.
"sweet" is a synonym for "lack of accuracy" When I saw the term sweet used about the Vennias on a couple of consumer posted reviews. I thought that word (as I think of it) doesn�t come to mind with these speakers. They seem closer to �clear� like water. But then I�m not always sure of the general consensus on the exact intent of much of the terminology/jargon in AV. (Still learning how to �talk� it). I do know that whenever I hear what
I think of as �bright�, it hurts my ears�. Some slower than others. I seem to hear 2 broad categories of brights going on out there in pre/pros and speakers�.One bright is more on what I would call the accurate side, but still on most of these to greater/lessor degree I get the sensation that it is fatiguing on a slower scale. And one �bright� which to me at its worst is hard-edged or even bordering strident and fatiguing very quickly. Remember that�s (my bright) but I need to get the jargon down as to how this industry perceives each term. (But I have been accused of even coming up with new words in the English language if I think it�al fit.) I was once told don�t use �dark� as a term for warmer sounding setups.

But that�s the word that pops to (my strange little mind) when I hear very warm sounding pre-pro�s. �A dark sound�. I wish you could hear these, I would like to hear your opinion (75 miles!). But to be honest I was not �Thrilled� with any of these speakers in the store. Every one, had one �area� in its sound that appeared lacking to me. The Vienna�s came the closest to doing this the least, or at least had a broader range of �what I think I like�.
When I paired them with the Outlaw they are stunning (acoustic guitar plucks make you want to cry) , and to be honest, I felt instantly �now this is ME.
(If I was a speaker �.something like the �voice� I�d want for myself).
I noticed the impedance difference�s I have going on now�.I did not care to try and understand the ramifications of this before when I had the matched set of Def Techs. All I knew with orginal speakers were specs were in line with what the Outlaw amp could handle. So far I�m not hearing a problem with the Outlaw running this new unmatched setup�.However, I never hung my BL/BR of the Def Techs so the Outlaw 770 is not handling a 7.1 load yet. I just realized while I was working today�.(Yippy) that tonight I can now wire for a singe back surround by just moving an interconnect!!! (The previous SR) Picture a room where everything is off axis to the walls. The way the Def techs were hung I have the SR behind me in a way that will work (temp) as a center back, till the dang husband gets in the dang attic. (I�ve never even heard my 950 in a 6.1 or 7.1 Setup!)
Charlie your right!. From the little I�ve read so far a sub is a great DIY jumpoff. Right now I�m just hoping the new speakers will inspire him to help me figure out the permanent stand/storage for the TV and the gear. He came home and started talking about it again�.and said we need to get this all finished and organized�(fingers crossed).