Gonk! As far as LF in the rear surrounds are concerned...you'd be surprised! Of course, various soundtracks have across the board responses with DTS 6.1 tracks the best.(The scene in "Return of the King" in which the King of the dead laughs at Aragon's proposal is an excellent example).
But none of this matters unless you have lots and lots of room space. My rear surrounds are approx. 13-14 ft behind your head. My faux 7.1(2) system is configured with a NHT SW-10 subwoofer hi-passed to M&K 55 Tripoles as the rear-surround component. I outboard an ancient Denon 3802 to my amplifiers(ATI2505, Elite M-90, and on occasion, some outlaw 200 monoblocks).
When the sound sources are a good deal behind your head, you start running into the "Hall/Precedence effect" concerning spatial cueing/location. With a dedicated 'rear' subwoofer,(my main sub is a M&K 350), that is properly blended with the satellites, soundtracks with rear/Lf are convincing and realistic. A lot of this has to do with the Munson/Fletcher response curve that gets wildly skewed with audio cues coming from directly behind. Anyways, I could go on a lot more about this, but suffice it to say I use this configuration with 6.1 soundtracks mostly and certain D/D soundtracks of merit(think Star Wars!) However, for the majority of soundtracks I actually prefer 5.1 for clarity that suffers from "matrixing" when expanded for rear surrounds. I don't know of anyone with this kind of set-up...but trust me....the LF in rear surrounds is more plentiful than most suspect. There is no processor for any money that will let me have my pre-eaten cake..My ultimate solution will be LFM-1(s) for every channel! 7.7 here we come!!!!!(just kidding)
_________________________
momperry