Outlaw Audio home shop products hideout news support about
Topic Options
#60966 - 06/20/06 10:53 PM what is more direct, 7.1 or 2-channel bypass?
jrlouie Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 03/05/06
Posts: 118
Loc: Missouri
Can anyone indicate what actually is the more direct/clean path with the least amount of A/D/A conversion, digitalization, etc.
For example, if I run all channels set to large for 7.1 direct but only use the 2 mains and connect 2-channel analog in from a CDP
or
If I run my analog in to the 2-channel analog CD in on the 990 with the mains set to large and processing to bypass.

Or is there no difference?

Top
#60967 - 06/20/06 11:03 PM Re: what is more direct, 7.1 or 2-channel bypass?
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
If the channels are all set to large, the 7.1 direct input stays in the analog domain all the way through. Likewise, stereo bypass stays in the analog domain all the way through and the sub stays out of the equation - there is no difference that I know of under those circumstances.

If the mains are set to small, the 7.1 input will go through A/D/A conversion for bass management, while the stereo analog bypass will stay analog all the way through and a full-range summed L/R copy will be sent to the sub.
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#60968 - 06/21/06 04:27 AM Re: what is more direct, 7.1 or 2-channel bypass?
Skyblazer Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 03/21/06
Posts: 255
Loc: Spokane, WA
thanks for explaining that.. and clearing it up for me and all others.. i wasn't clear on that either. wink
_________________________
Outlaw Audio 990 pre amp
Adire Audio sub (SVS 12.2 driver)
CAL Alpha tube DAC
Parasound P/HP-850 2 CH pre
Pioneer PL-530 TT
Polk Audio SDA 2B
NAD 2600A amp
Danger Boy here

Top
#60969 - 06/21/06 09:13 AM Re: what is more direct, 7.1 or 2-channel bypass?
jrlouie Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 03/05/06
Posts: 118
Loc: Missouri
yes, thanks!

Top
#60970 - 06/21/06 01:06 PM Re: what is more direct, 7.1 or 2-channel bypass?
psyprof1 Offline
Desperado

Registered: 09/10/05
Posts: 443
Loc: Santa Barbara, CA
Okay, I've got a related question. On analog inputs (tuner, tape, VCR, or phono) with no sampling frequency, isn't "Upsample" meaningless? And if it is, why does it show as one of the modes available from the remote's "Stereo" button?

Top
#60971 - 06/21/06 04:07 PM Re: what is more direct, 7.1 or 2-channel bypass?
TommyBoy Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 05/03/06
Posts: 16
Gonk,
What if you also compare analog direct to the total number of conversions (in the entire signal path back to the CD) you get by using a digital input from your CD player with the 990 in Bypass mode with Tone Defeat on?

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 986 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
audio123, Dustin _69c10, Dain, REP, caffeinated
8717 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
The Wyrm 3
FAUguy 2
butchgo 2
kiwiaudio 1
Forum Stats
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,708 Posts

Most users ever online: 1,171 @ Today at 03:40 AM