Outlaw Audio home shop products hideout news support about
Topic Options
#54607 - 06/13/05 10:50 AM Question re: channel calibration
pills Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/01/05
Posts: 6
Loc: Memphis,Tn
Hi guys,
I am not sure whether this is a problem or not.
With the 950 I was able to get 85 db spl with front ,center and surround channels trimmed to -3 to -4.With the 990 though I have to trim them up to + 2 to 5 to get the same spl levels.I have the master volume set to 0 db while calibrating with the avia disc with both the 950 and 990.Also room and speaker locations are identical.
I heard somewhere that it is not a good idea to trim channel levels higher than zero.Wonder if this is true.

Top
#54608 - 06/13/05 11:24 AM Re: Question re: channel calibration
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
I'm not sure why there is such a difference in settings between the two units. I didn't see it in the 990 manual just now, but the 950 manual recommended calibrating to 75dB (which is what I did). I did the same with the 990 prior to running the auto-setup, and the auto-setup's values were very similar to my manual settings. I did not compare the settings on my 990 to those on my 950, but I don't think there was more than a few dB variation between the two.

Is it bad to set the trim above 0? I don't believe so. It is often recommended that you not set the trim control on an amp to close to its highest position, and I have run into trouble with an older Parasound amp hissing a bit when the trim was set high, but I don't think the trim settings in a receiver or processor are as susceptible to this as an amp. If you are concerned about it, find the highest trim setting (apparently +5) and shift all of the settings down by that value (so the highest trim used is 0dB) and see how it sounds compared to the way it was. You'll need to crank the volume up 5dB from where it was before, of course, but otherwise I would expect the change to have no effect on the sound.

Wow... Two 990's in Memphis already... That's sort of cool. smile
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#54609 - 06/13/05 12:50 PM Re: Question re: channel calibration
pills Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/01/05
Posts: 6
Loc: Memphis,Tn
Thanks for the help.
I guess I will try auto calibration again to see if it matches my settings.The first time I tried auto it gave me wildly different distances for the front speakers and kept saying that the fronts were set at large.
I wonder if the test tone intensities are different on the 950 and the 990 at least the one that I got.

Top
#54610 - 08/09/05 01:24 PM Re: Question re: channel calibration
Lonster Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 07/18/05
Posts: 72
Loc: Eureka CA.
As a follow up question, when I run my auto calibration, at what setting should the volume be set at?
0 db (full volume) or some other setting?
thanks,
Lonster
_________________________
Lonny
Vintage Audio and Vintage Bikes, both SOUND great!
QpS

Top
#54611 - 08/09/05 01:32 PM Re: Question re: channel calibration
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
Auto calibration should take care of itself automatically, without any concern as to the volume setting. Manual calibration should generally be done at 0dB.
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#54612 - 08/09/05 02:01 PM Re: Question re: channel calibration
Lonster Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 07/18/05
Posts: 72
Loc: Eureka CA.
Thanks!
_________________________
Lonny
Vintage Audio and Vintage Bikes, both SOUND great!
QpS

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 131 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
REP, caffeinated, WooWho, Ali, garyedward
8714 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
scoooter 2
butchgo 2
Veeper 1
Forum Stats
8,714 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,330 Topics
98,700 Posts

Most users ever online: 677 @ 42 minutes 17 seconds ago