#54394 - 06/01/05 12:34 AM
990 vs. 950, for fence sitters
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 05/19/05
Posts: 24
Loc: NY
|
I dont need a lot of the features in the 990, I like that its new but for 600$ less i can get a 950, my main goal is sound quality is the 990's alleged better sound worth 600$?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#54395 - 06/01/05 12:52 AM
Re: 990 vs. 950, for fence sitters
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 05/23/05
Posts: 35
|
It is better. If it is worth it is a very personal decision. Was my Classe amp worth the money?
The 950 is smaller and easier to use. The 990 does more and may last you longer before you want to replace it.
Some minor nice features: Headphone amp, front panel inputs. Biggest anoyance: no front panel setup display.
I have both in my home right now and am struggling with which one to keep, for the reasons above.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#54396 - 06/01/05 02:00 AM
Re: 990 vs. 950, for fence sitters
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 11/20/03
Posts: 56
|
I have both right now as well, used the 990 for two weeks and swapped the 950 back in the other day (990 back in tonight)...no contest, 990 for me.
Better 'ease of use', more features, better sound (IMO), that's what upgrades are for =)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#54397 - 06/01/05 09:37 PM
Re: 990 vs. 950, for fence sitters
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 01/31/04
Posts: 81
Loc: Bartlesville, OK USA
|
bigal, do you really think it's better ? or is it just a mental thing (wanting to hear $600 worth of better), if you really think it is better, what do you feel is better about it ? i have both in my home now as well, but have a very small defect with the 990, and am returning this one, but am still open to acquiring one again in the future. thanks.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#54398 - 06/01/05 09:43 PM
Re: 990 vs. 950, for fence sitters
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 10/11/04
Posts: 183
Loc: Green Bay, WI
|
Yeah, those 950's are going like hot cakes on Ebay right now. Zoiks! I decided to replace my 950 with the 990. Man this thing sounds amazing! I'm wow'd every time I turn it on and pipe some music through it....
later, sraber
_________________________
Marantz av7005 Proc. Oppo BDP-83 Rotel RB-991 (mains) Outlaw Audio Model 2200 (center) Rotel RMB-1075 (ss, rs) f, B&W DM604S3 c, B&W LCR600S3 ss, B&W DM302 rs,Polk M3II HSU VTF-3 MK3 APC H-15 Power Conditioner Display: Panny PT-AE4000 Proj. + 92" DIY Screen Little Dot MKIII Headphone Amp Denon AH-D1100 Headphones (needed a quick, cheap set. looking for an upgrade worthy of the h/p amp.)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#54399 - 06/02/05 12:19 AM
Re: 990 vs. 950, for fence sitters
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 05/19/05
Posts: 24
Loc: NY
|
Well guys I just pulled the trigger on the 950...the 990's extra features were things I really didnt need, I think an amp effects the sound more than a preamp, the 950 will be my interim preamp, Im sure I'll be one of the 1st to preorder when the Outlaw 1000 preamp hits the scene with features that don't yet exist like HDMI inputs
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#54400 - 06/02/05 06:03 AM
Re: 990 vs. 950, for fence sitters
|
Desperado
Registered: 01/12/05
Posts: 368
Loc: Miami
|
Ender, congrats on the 950. It is a nice sounding unit. I gotta tell you though -from my experience- the pre has affected the sound in my system more than anything else. Speakers come a close second.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#54401 - 06/02/05 03:29 PM
Re: 990 vs. 950, for fence sitters
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 03/14/03
Posts: 59
Loc: Riverside
|
Speakers come a close second. Wow! You mean the only device that actually produce a sound is only "close second"? You kidding right?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#54402 - 06/02/05 03:38 PM
Re: 990 vs. 950, for fence sitters
|
Desperado
Registered: 01/12/05
Posts: 368
Loc: Miami
|
That's been my experience. In my system the biggest upgrade I made was to my Sherwood. The Lsis were a huge upgrade also but not as dramatic. You will know when I am kidding.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
1100
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,708 Posts
Most users ever online: 1,034 @ 41 minutes 50 seconds ago
|
|
|
|