Outlaw Audio home shop products hideout news support about
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#52955 - 05/08/05 12:22 PM Manual vs Auto time delay(speaker distances)
Twistedmister Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 05/08/05
Posts: 7
I would like to know the smallest increment available for setting speaker distance(delay) in the manual mode vs the auto setup mode.

I would also like to know the smallest increment available for setting volume levels in the manual mode vs the auto mode.

I've had processors in the past that used one foot increments for delay, but that was not a small enough increment to allow accurate setup when speaker location was already defined. When I began using a processor with one tenth of a foot increments the setup was virtually pinpoint.
This same thing was true with half db volume increments vs one db.

I was curious to know if one method of setup was more accurate then the other, and by what margin.

Greg,

Top
#52956 - 05/08/05 04:11 PM Re: Manual vs Auto time delay(speaker distances)
tbng Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 06/11/04
Posts: 23
Loc: Red Lion PA USA
I also want to know if the 990 will measure distances separately for surrounds and rears, something the 950 did not do and that I considered to be one of its design shortcomings.

Top
#52957 - 05/08/05 06:44 PM Re: Manual vs Auto time delay(speaker distances)
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
Based on the newly-posted manual, it appears that the speaker distances are set in one foot increments, the trim levels are set in 1dB increments, and each individual channel (all seven speakers plus the subwoofer) has separate distance and trim settings.
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#52958 - 05/08/05 07:48 PM Re: Manual vs Auto time delay(speaker distances)
jhunt1 Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 04/01/05
Posts: 54
Loc: Yarmouth, ME
Quote:
it appears that the speaker distances are set in one foot increments, the trim levels are set in 1dB increments
That's a bummer
_________________________
John

Top
#52959 - 05/08/05 08:10 PM Re: Manual vs Auto time delay(speaker distances)
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
I started to spell out in somewhat sarcastic detail why I'm not upset about the inability to dial into to 0.5ft and 0.5dB increments, but I stopped. It was an argument based largely on an old college debate between my senior-level Experimental Techniques class and our rather insane professor (a man who claimed to be able to draw perfect lines and circles freehand and who insisted that anyone should be able to measure down to 1/64th of an inch with a scale whose smallest increment of measure was 1/8th of an inch). He took it as a personal offense that we refused to deviate from "undergraduate" uncertainty analysis that insisted you could not measure anything closer than one-half of the smallest gradation of your measuring device, even though the intended purpose of the class was to learn to conduct tests and experiments in a manner that followed the accepted rules of experimental technique. Needless to say, most of us found the class a bit exasperating.

The 1 foot and the 1dB increments are pretty standard, and at least in my experience they've been pretty effective. A few people may find that it deprives them of an extra bit of fine control over system setup, but in most cases I don't see that it will do any harm at all. The real good news here, though, is the discrete distance settings for all eight channels - this is something that the 950 lacked due to limited processing power, and something that I think many people will find very helpful.
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#52960 - 05/08/05 10:34 PM Re: Manual vs Auto time delay(speaker distances)
Twistedmister Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 05/08/05
Posts: 7
Thanks,I did't notice that the manual was released.

The manual reads as we see here but that does not answer my question. I would still like to know if the auto setup is more accurate. perhaps it uses a higher internal resolution to set the delays and volume levels, ultimately providing a more accurate setting. Perhaps this question can't be answered at this time.

When positioning speakers using an in/out of phase test tone, a couple of inches can make a big change in the swing of an SPL meter. If one's speaker positions are defined and you must use delays, two or three tenths of a foot can make the difference between a radical swing and none at all.

Although this is not a critical point to everyone it can make a huge difference in the stereo soundfield. I've seen this first-hand.

I agree that it is critical to have all speakers adjustable. Not everyone has a dedicated room or a forgiving SO.

The half db volume increments are not as important to me.

Greg,

Top
#52961 - 05/09/05 05:46 PM Re: Manual vs Auto time delay(speaker distances)
E'pin Sen Ob Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 05/04/05
Posts: 226
Loc: USA
I think you hit it on the head . Someone is going to have to test drive this thing in a home environment to truly answer your question . Anything else is just speculation . But fear not I am sure you will hear all about it in a few short weeks .
_________________________
ONE MAN SHOOTIN GALLERY

MY HOME THEATER PICTURES http://community.webshots.com/user/bonesnipe

Top
#52962 - 05/09/05 06:20 PM Re: Manual vs Auto time delay(speaker distances)
boblinds Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 02/07/03
Posts: 242
Loc: Los Angeles
If you think you need 0.5-foot increments in the delays, just be very, VERY sure that you put your head in a restraining device, because any slight movement of your ears will destroy the accuracy of the imaging.

Top
#52963 - 05/09/05 11:29 PM Re: Manual vs Auto time delay(speaker distances)
PodBoy Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 05/09/05
Posts: 281
Twisted One:

I have to agree with boblinds. I'm new here, but have been around stereo and home theater for quite a while. Do you REALLY think that adjusting the sound field to 6 INCHES really makes a difference? And even if it did, do you listen all by yourself, or do you want something that includes someone who is outside your six inch bubble. You're kidding, right?

Have you ever done a blind test with those (very few and expensive) products that can resolve the delay down to 6 INCHES (!) to find out if you can hear the difference?

Then again, now stick with me on this one, YOU CAN MOVE THE SPEAKERS THREE INCHES AND YOUR SEATING POSITION THREE INCHES AND YOU HAVE SIX INCH RESOLUTION FOR THE DELAY.

Then again, you could listen using one of the many stereo preamps that offer delay time adjustments to 6 INCH increments, right?

Top
#52964 - 05/10/05 09:14 AM Re: Manual vs Auto time delay(speaker distances)
Twistedmister Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 05/08/05
Posts: 7
Boblinds'

I,m working on that device right now.


Podboy,

No, tenth inches.
Yes/no.
No, I've never been blind.
I don't know what that means.
I do, but its eight channels and in tenths of a foot.


All,

It's a good thing I was just asking a question and not seeking unanimous agreement.

Still wondering.....

Greg,

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 986 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
audio123, Dustin _69c10, Dain, REP, caffeinated
8717 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
The Wyrm 3
FAUguy 2
butchgo 2
kiwiaudio 1
Forum Stats
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,708 Posts

Most users ever online: 1,171 @ Today at 03:40 AM