#49451 - 06/17/01 08:51 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 04/10/01
Posts: 2
|
nay, thumbs down.
to me, dsp's are not passionatly hated, just not used.
only possible thought i have is added sale value, the masses like extra features. 'course the masses havent discovered outlaw yet......
------------------ 'Till next time, Rich (The kite guy)
_________________________
'Till next time, Rich (The kite guy)
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49452 - 06/17/01 08:58 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 03/06/01
Posts: 7
|
I vote YES.
Put them off in a sub-menu so they don't interfere with normal usage, but put them there. You never know when someone might have a special situation where a DSP mode is actually useful. Better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it.
Plus, DSP modes impress JoBlows, you might sell a couple more units just because they are a check-list item.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49453 - 06/17/01 09:03 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/17/01
Posts: 2
Loc: Richmond Hill
|
NO to useless DSPs. Music should be listened as it is; not edited neither by content or sound colour.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49454 - 06/17/01 09:03 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 04/10/01
Posts: 2
Loc: Houston, TX
|
NAY. Except for DPL2 and 5/7 channel stereo.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49455 - 06/17/01 09:09 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/17/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Pickering, Ontario, Canada
|
Although I my self do not use any of the DSP's available on receivers/pre-pros there may be others who enjoy them. It is for this reason ( and since they do not cost anything extra) That they should be included...) Perhaps you could included a service menu which allows you to select which DSP's show up. That way it could be user selectable...
As for DPL II absolutely include it!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49456 - 06/17/01 09:10 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/17/01
Posts: 7
|
If adding DSP's do not increase the price or hurt the performance then go ahead and add a few. Like stadium, jazz, night club, matrix.
If they do not hurt anything then add them. For those of you, who do not like them, then don't use them. For us who do, it would be great.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49457 - 06/17/01 09:16 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/17/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Denver, Co. usa
|
Yes include them. I used my Lexicons DSP quite often, for pleasent change. Plus since your not including THX ES discrete, this can be used as a supplement.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49458 - 06/17/01 09:18 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 04/12/01
Posts: 2
|
DSP's are about the most useless things on any receiver/processor. It seems the higher up the food chain you go (marantz sr14ex, sr18ex, B&K 307, etc) the less DSPs there are. Great gimic for sony or JVC. A big NAY!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49459 - 06/17/01 09:20 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/17/01
Posts: 1
Loc: NorCal
|
Thumbs down.
I don't find DSPs to be of any sonic benefit. They just clutter up the interface.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49460 - 06/17/01 09:47 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 04/10/01
Posts: 24
Loc: Wilmington, NC
|
No to including extra DSP modes on the 950.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
785
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,708 Posts
Most users ever online: 1,171 @ Yesterday at 03:40 AM
|
|
|
|