#49521 - 06/18/01 09:20 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Tampa, FL, USA
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49522 - 06/18/01 09:34 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 9
Loc: Oradell,NJ,USA
|
Leave them out except for perhaps a simulated stereo mode for old mono movies.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49523 - 06/18/01 09:46 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/17/01
Posts: 2
Loc: Flower Mound, TX, USA
|
I say no to DSPs. I never use them, and they just complicate the user interface. Dean
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49524 - 06/18/01 09:54 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 04/23/01
Posts: 5
Loc: Placitas, NM, USA
|
dsp's...never liked them, most likely never will...keep it simple and elegant and just make sure it sounds and looks great and we will all be happy....nay to dsp....gavin
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49525 - 06/18/01 09:59 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Silver Spring, MD USA
|
I actually used the "game" mode on my old sony when I had friends over to watch a game. It basically cranked up the rears and had the announcers come out everywhere. Made it so I could turn the volume down enough that we could all talk, but could all still hear the game as well. I haven't had a game get together at my house since getting my 1050, so I haven't used the sound fields at all. So, I vote nay. If you're reading, I have some ideas to make the unit more usable to SO's. My wife has tons of problems w/ the 1050. Feel free to e-mail me.
Jay St. Peter
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49526 - 06/18/01 10:02 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 04/20/01
Posts: 128
Loc: Charlotte, NC, USA
|
Yes but only include 1. The Natural mode when functioning correctly does a better job than ProLogic (old, not II) in re-creating good center and ambience from bogus TV material. I use Natural, Stereo and Surround all the time, pending the material. The rest I never have tried.
S.
I thought about it some more and after trying out the included DSP's last night, I would lean more toward none than all. Maybe discrete IR code access would be a plus, but that could be a huge headache.
If only 1 or 2 are there or there is discrete access to the few individuals with programmable remotes who like certain ones, I say sure. Otherwise, nay for me.
S^2.
[This message has been edited by MrSandman (edited June 19, 2001).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49527 - 06/18/01 10:03 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Brigham City, Ut. USA
|
I think for marketing reasons you need a couple but I could always do without them since I never use them. You might want to include a 5 or 7 channel stereo mode though...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49528 - 06/18/01 10:11 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Fairview Heights, IL
|
DPL II - yes!
other DSP's - NO!
never used them, never will.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49529 - 06/18/01 10:17 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Strongsville
|
DPL II of course, the only extra maybe Stadium, it can make a ballgame more interesting sometimes.
_________________________
There is no spoon!!!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49530 - 06/18/01 10:19 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 04/11/01
Posts: 4
|
I'd like you to include DPL II, DTS, DD, and 5/7 stereo mode but that is it. Rarely, if ever, do I use DSP modes. Quite frankly, they are something I could easily live without and never miss them. Real HTers don't use DSP modes. DPL II isn't considered a DSP mode. This vote is definately a "no" for DSP modes.
[This message has been edited by BryanZ (edited June 20, 2001).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
53
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,703 Posts
Most users ever online: 677 @ 09/27/24 06:41 PM
|
|
|
|