#49542 - 06/18/01 11:33 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 2
Loc: Michigan
|
I vote for YES. I watch alot of sports on channels which broadcast in either DPL, stereo, or mono. I always listen to these in the DPL or a DSP for the stereo/mono broadcasts. I agree some DSP's are worthless while others are very useful. I believe DPL II will be used for all if DPL II is what it is cracked up to be.
Input, settings, level memories is also important on a pre/pro. I have up to 3 tv's on at any one time. When I switch between video/audio sources it is nice to have the last settings remembered. ie. DD for DVD input and associated settings, DPL II and settings for TV input, direct and settings for CD input, etc.
Other features I like: Adjustable crossovers are nice. Direct access to modes (DD, DPL, Hall, statium, etc). Backlit remote. Station channel or letters for tuner. not preset number.
That's all for now. Thanks for letting me play,
------------------ MaxCast
_________________________
MaxCast
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49543 - 06/18/01 11:49 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 10
Loc: Franklin, TN USA
|
I vote yea - why not if cost will not increase and will not impact the performance.
_________________________
Outlaw Model 950 nOrh marble 9.0's and marble 4.0's VMPS New Orginal subs nOrh Le Amp monoblocks QSC PLX-1602 amp
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49544 - 06/18/01 11:50 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 2
Loc: Houston, TX
|
I vote Nay on the DSP's.
I have a Yamaha receiver with numerous DSP's. I have tried them all out and was not all that impressed.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49545 - 06/18/01 11:53 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Jeannette, PA
|
I vote nay. Just include DPL II and 5 or 7 channel stereo. DSPs aren't needed.
Thanks.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49546 - 06/18/01 11:54 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Colorado Springs, CO, USA
|
Put me down as a YES to DSPs.
We have a number of TV stations in this area that are STILL broadcasting in mono so anything that would make mono sound better would be appreciated. Sporting events in mono are very dull.
I have used "Live" and "Concert Hall" for stereo signals without DPL encoding. Unless DPL II is better I would continue to use those types of DSPs.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49547 - 06/18/01 11:57 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 5
Loc: NH, USA
|
I'd say NO to DSPs in general (the typical Stadium, et al. reverb DSPs), but I would love to see a 5-7 channel stereo mode like Denon, Lexicon, etc.
KJP
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49548 - 06/18/01 12:01 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 2
|
I don't find the extra DSP modes of interest and would personally prefer them left off.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49549 - 06/18/01 12:30 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Chippewa Falls, WI USA
|
I'm all for DPL-II but you can leave out the other DSPs, IMHO. ------------------ Timing is Everything
_________________________
Timing is Everything
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49550 - 06/18/01 12:39 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 04/10/01
Posts: 29
Loc: Plano, TX
|
I don't use them much, but since it is not a cost issue, then why not. I would hate to see the lack there of , to be used against the 950. I can the the magazine article now.... "but the 950 lacks the DSP modes that most of the competition has."
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
464
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,708 Posts
Most users ever online: 1,171 @ Yesterday at 03:40 AM
|
|
|
|