As long as it doesn't add anything to the price, why not add a few extra options? All it needs is an intuitive user interface for the DSP modes.

No DSP, i never use em anyway

My response to this topic is "nay" to the new DSP's, which are rarely, if at all listened to. If cost is not an object, use the resources to develop an even better product; to my understanding is a knockout piece of audio equipment.

Thumbs UP. While I never use them myself, I would hate for you to lose
customers based on a lack of DSP's. Shoot, some poor soul may consider your
lack of DSP support a sign that you are still an 'up and comer'. They've
worked for Yamaha, Sony, Lexicon... why the hell not- especially if they
don't weigh down your COGS.

Nope, nada, no thanks!
Pete

From a marketing standpoint, more the merrier if it is no cost. I would list them at the end of the other mainstream options so you don't have to wade through all of them to get to where you want to be.

I do find occasional use for the phantom modes that redistribute the center to L/R speakers.

I wholeheartedly agree with other posters that bass management is where it's at. If it were a choice between b-m and extra modes, there would be no contest.

--Keith--

Real men don't use DSPs.

So that would be another vote 'No'.

------------------

This is a tough question. Taking into account that Outlaw is making such great products (I really wanna win haha) , I would think that you should only keep the DSP modes if you are able to produce them at a greater quality than what is already out there. If any improvements cannot be made, then theres no point in including them.

Yes.. Why Not, If you don't like them, don't use them.

Mark

Thumbs down! I have never, ever used them. But please DO include Dolby Surround EX, in addition to DPL-II and DTS-ES Discrete.