#49761 - 07/03/01 11:09 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/03/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Florida
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49762 - 07/03/01 11:12 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/03/01
Posts: 2
Loc: Plano, TX USA
|
I say leave out the DSP's. They are gimmicky, usually sound bad, and I think most enthusiast's never use them. I think they also only confuse users who aren't familiar with all the formats and proper use of the equipment.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49763 - 07/03/01 11:42 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/03/01
Posts: 2
Loc: Dallas, TX
|
Yet another Nay vote.
Like most, I played with the DSP modes on my receiver when I first got it. None of them sounded vary good, not even DPI. I never have used them since.
I'm looking forward to hearing DPII, to see if it lives up to the hype, but the rest of the DSP modes I would never miss.
_________________________
E
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49764 - 07/03/01 12:03 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/03/01
Posts: 1
Loc: St. Louis, MO
|
AS long as it truly does not effect cost or quality, then a limited number of DSP's is fine by me, like 5 or 7 channel stereo and maybe Matrix 3 channel if DPL2 does not already handle that well. SO, my answer is yes, a few, given that it does not effect quality or cost. ------------------ My toys at http://www.sdiver.org
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49765 - 07/03/01 12:15 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/03/01
Posts: 2
Loc: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
|
No on extra DSPs, I've never used them, and probably never will.
DPLII sounds good, and maybe even a 5, 6 or 7 channel stereo though.
"Nay"
[This message has been edited by Duane_T (edited July 03, 2001).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49766 - 07/03/01 12:18 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/03/01
Posts: 1
|
If it does not affect the cost, the I would say yes. There are a couple of DSP modes on my DB930 that I enjoy for use for TV viewing.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49767 - 07/03/01 12:30 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/03/01
Posts: 1
|
No DSP's, Yes to PLII. Analog Bypass would be great.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49768 - 07/03/01 12:56 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/03/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Wyckoff, NJ
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49769 - 07/03/01 01:06 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/03/01
Posts: 6
Loc: War Eagle Country
|
Thumbs Up If there is no price difference why not include a few? Not including them will hurt your marketability... and the rest of us will buy it anyways. I don't know of anyone not buying a nice piece of equipment because of the DSPs included... but I do know of somethat didn't buy because there are no DSP's. These are the ones I would use. -DPLII -DPL (Yes... include the original!) -5 Channel Stereo (or equivalent, I love this on the Denons) -Mono (Do something with mono instead of just throwing it at my center channel... I have 6 speakers I want to use them!) Anything extra is just icing on the cake. ------------------ *************** -Jin My Home Theater [This message has been edited by Jin Elkins (edited July 03, 2001).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49770 - 07/03/01 01:13 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 04/19/01
Posts: 2
Loc: Denton, Texas USA
|
I don't really mind them at all. I think the more the merrier. If I don't like them, I won't use them, but I like having the option.
------------------ "Have good mosh pitting!"
_________________________
"Have good mosh pitting!"
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
1100
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,708 Posts
Most users ever online: 1,034 @ 41 minutes 50 seconds ago
|
|
|
|