No DSP modes. Who uses those ?

I say Nay!!

Just more modes to get into when you don't want it ( or know it!). Just keep it simple for me.

Joe

No thanks to the DSP modes. I never use them and it's just another option that will cause people to become confused. DPL II is excellent and I feel there is no need for anything further.

thumbs down on DSP's

Yea. Why not, if it doesn't disturb anything else who cares.

I would say that they should be included although I would probably never use the nor would most people, but I would like the option just in case and I don't think that they would clutter up any menus.
Brandon

I vote NAY.

I've listened to each of them on my 1050 (and other past receivers) and can't stand their sound for an extended period of time.

It's either 2 channel sound for music or "surround" mode for movies.

Alfer

------------------
Check out my HT website: The Enormodome

Join Club Enormodome

I say yes to the DSP modes. If it's not going to cost anymore then why not add them. I own a Yamaha receiver that has a multitude of DSP modes. I rarely use them for music but I love the different Theater modes and use the different modes depending on the type of movie I'm watching. My interface is not 'cluttered' at all. In fact, all of the modes are selectable from the front panel or through via the remote control. Just make sure that if you use DSP modes that you make their functions available directly instead of toggling.

------------------
"Nevah underestimate the powah of the Dahk Shyde.."

I vote "Yes" for additional DSP modes. No extra cost, some will use them and some won't. Every room is different so some modes will sound great in some rooms and phony in others. More user choices is always better.

A No vote from me.

I have never used the DSPs on any of my other A/V receivers, so it seems a waste. Keep It Simple.