#49731 - 07/02/01 05:13 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 03/20/01
Posts: 12
Loc: Portland, OR USA
|
My vote: No DSP modes. My thoughts: When I see a unit with many bells & whistles, I DON'T think of quality. I think of quantity. A Pre/Pro that does not have a lot of bells & whistles will always seem to focus on other things such as build quality, sound quality, etc. ------------------ Bruce Tiller WT-46807 Toshiba SD-6200 Outlaw 1050 Receiver Definitive Tech BP2004TL My DVD list
_________________________
Bruce Tiller Mits WT-46807 Toshiba SD-6200 Outlaw 1050 Receiver Definitive Tech BP2004TL My DVD list
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49732 - 07/02/01 05:50 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/02/01
Posts: 3
Loc: Chicago
|
As long as there is no extra cost or trade-off, why not? Plus maybe you Outlaws can create some DSP's that are accually useful!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49733 - 07/02/01 11:10 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/02/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Atlanta, GA
|
I have to say NAY to DSPs!
[This message has been edited by ej1111 (edited July 02, 2001).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49734 - 07/02/01 11:19 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/02/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Van Nuys, CA USA
|
Yes - thumbs up
-...to a few dsp modes. I think 4 channel stereo (no center channel), 5 channel stereo, a Party dsp (I forget what it is usually called) that mirrors the front L/R stereo signal in the rear L/R speakers so you end up with the same signal in the front and rear left speakers as well as the same signal in the right front and rear speakers (I hope that makes sense.) It also might be interesting to have one mode that could be completely tweaked (reverb, decay, etc...) and saved to one's own preference. I usually never use any of the hall, cinema, or concert dsps'.
thanks Outlaw
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49735 - 07/02/01 11:26 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/02/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Tulsa, OK
|
Nope on DSPs. The only one I ever use is Dolby Pro Logic II, and it isn't really a DSP. If cost isn't an issue, sure put them on there but dont cut back on something else for more DSPs.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49736 - 07/02/01 11:31 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/02/01
Posts: 1
|
NO DSP's. If I wanted to listen to a jazz club I'd go there and not in my home. Used DSP's for several years with that Yamaha receiver. Tired and worn out with that crap Thanks.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49737 - 07/02/01 11:36 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 04/12/01
Posts: 1
|
Maybe a multi-channel stereo mode for when you want some background music while you are doing things around the house, but other than that--no.
DJ
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49738 - 07/02/01 11:36 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/02/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Test Location
|
i vote yeah on dsp modes.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49739 - 07/02/01 11:49 PM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/02/01
Posts: 1
Loc: placentia, CA USA
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49740 - 07/03/01 12:37 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 07/03/01
Posts: 1
Loc: NY,NY USA
|
I like the idea of Pro-logic II being included. As for the other DSPs, I think that they are unnecessary. I never use them but would not be against including them (unless they add to the cost!).
Allan
[This message has been edited by Allan (edited July 03, 2001).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
847
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,703 Posts
Most users ever online: 846 @ 1 second ago
|
|
|
|