Outlaw Audio home shop products hideout news support about
Page 10 of 45 < 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 44 45 >
Topic Options
#49471 - 06/17/01 10:42 PM Re: The Great DSP Debate
Andrew_S Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/17/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Lexington, KY, USA
I never use DSP modes. If they will take extra space on the chip that can be used for future upgradeability, that's a double no...

Top
#49472 - 06/17/01 10:52 PM Re: The Great DSP Debate
ctekell Offline
Gunslinger

Registered: 04/11/01
Posts: 15
Loc: Alamogordo, NM, USA
Thumbs up. I am not fond of then as abything moew than a fun gadget to play with from time to time, but their presence does not take away from anything, except to annoy a few grouchy folks, but they add ti the experience of a few people who really like them.

Regards,

C.E. Tekell

Top
#49473 - 06/17/01 11:05 PM Re: The Great DSP Debate
Pat Pepper Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/17/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Delran, NJ, USA
Yes to DSPs, but limit them to a useful set. I never use any of the DSPs on my Yamaha receiver. The gimmicky processing and added reverb just don't sound realistic. The only DSPs that I would be interested in are 5/7 channel stereo with a derived center, similar to Lexicon's Party mode, and a DSP mode to provide some derived ambience from old mono movies. I'm planning to replace the Yamaha with separates in the near future. Features such as these may make the decision easier

Top
#49474 - 06/17/01 11:12 PM Re: The Great DSP Debate
Marbles Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 05/22/01
Posts: 8
Keep it Simple Outlaws. I vote no to complexity. Rarely do I use the DSP's on my Elite receiver. Looking forward to the 950 coming out.
_________________________
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life son.

Top
#49475 - 06/17/01 11:23 PM Re: The Great DSP Debate
daveb Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/17/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Austin,TX, Texas
Thumbs Down. DSP doesnt fit your target market

Top
#49476 - 06/17/01 11:35 PM Re: The Great DSP Debate
Robert George Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/17/01
Posts: 1
Yes.

Cost is stated as not an issue. The inclusion of DSP modes will not adversely affect the sound quality of the piece. It is only smart business to design a product that will be useful and appeal to the widest market. If DSP features help sell a good product, and thus make a good company more successful, then why should anyone complain?

Good luck to Outlaw (and me, I'd like to try one of these).

Top
#49477 - 06/17/01 11:36 PM Re: The Great DSP Debate
Phil Wang Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 03/08/01
Posts: 3
Loc: Long Island, NY, USA
Nay on the DSP modes. I've never found any of them useful.

------------------
========
= Phil =
========
_________________________
========
= Phil =
========

Top
#49478 - 06/17/01 11:56 PM Re: The Great DSP Debate
Takosan Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/17/01
Posts: 1
Thumbs down on DSP

Top
#49479 - 06/17/01 11:59 PM Re: The Great DSP Debate
Curt Jett Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/17/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Middletown, Oh
I say nay to the DSP modes.

Top
#49480 - 06/18/01 12:01 AM Re: The Great DSP Debate
Stanley Yamane Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 06/17/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Needham, MA, USA
I was going to say yes, but then I remembered - no feature is ever free. And I'd rather the Outlaws work on getting the things that really matter - sound quality, reliability and value done right than spending even a second thinking about how to fit a bunch of random DSP modes into the menus (or having to explain them in the docs, QA that they're working as designed, etc).

So I vote - skip 'em. The product sounds like it'll be great enough already without them.

Top
Page 10 of 45 < 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 44 45 >

Who's Online
0 registered (), 130 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
audio123, Dustin _69c10, Dain, REP, caffeinated
8717 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
FAUguy 2
butchgo 1
Forum Stats
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,703 Posts

Most users ever online: 884 @ Today at 01:32 AM