#49611 - 06/19/01 01:22 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/19/01
Posts: 2
|
I almost never use those silly DSP modes. Some of them you can't even tell the difference between anyway...
However, I think they should be included, in some obscure place, just so people don't call it "not fully featured" and people don't get confused in the menu stuff. In order not to clutter the menu, just add one menu option named somethink like "extras" and throw all the useless crap in there.
_________________________
Luke Sankey He who laughs, lasts.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49612 - 06/19/01 02:00 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 06/16/01
Posts: 20
Loc: Garden Grove Ca. U.S.A.
|
I currently have a receiver with 16 dsp modes and have tried them all to see what the difference is and haven't used them at all. Now my wife on the other hand likes to use the Disco setting because of the echo yuck!! Well to each his own I say so I would take it either way as long as it did not compromise performance. ------------------
[This message has been edited by Vinny (edited June 19, 2001).]
_________________________
Vinny
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49613 - 06/19/01 04:30 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/19/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Canada
|
No for DSP. I will buy Sony if I need DSP.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49614 - 06/19/01 07:07 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Owasso, Ok USA
|
No, never use the ones I have....just extra clutter.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49615 - 06/19/01 08:56 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 1
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49616 - 06/19/01 09:13 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/19/01
Posts: 1
Loc: NH,USA
|
No - I never really use them - I'm anxious to hear Pro Logic II.
Bob
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49617 - 06/19/01 10:07 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 06/19/01
Posts: 1
Loc: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
|
Nay on the DSP modes. While they have a certain 'neat' factor, I don't think I have ever used one on my current reciever.
The only one that might be nice is something to expand a mono movie soundtrack across the front soundstage a bit.
Walter.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49618 - 06/19/01 10:28 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 04/10/01
Posts: 10
Loc: Omaha, NE
|
Music DSP's are not for me. My old Yamaha had a few and I never liked any of them enough to use them. So, if there were no "Hall", "Disco", or "K-Mart" I would definately not miss them.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49619 - 06/19/01 10:54 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 03/14/01
Posts: 3
Loc: Southern CA USA
|
Thumbs down, unless the DSP can be improved on, for example: The Sony DRE-S777, here is a quote from Sony "The DRE-S777 Sampling Digital Reverb is a unique reverb processor, which derives it's sound not from artificially generated algorithms, but from actual impulse response samples of real acoustic spaces" This unit is approx. $7.500 and is pro-level gear. I have used it and the DSP modes it provides are superb. Only if Outlaw can get just a few of these samples and incorporate them into the 950.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#49620 - 06/19/01 11:07 AM
Re: The Great DSP Debate
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 04/13/01
Posts: 2
Loc: Grapevine, TX
|
DPL II and nothing else!
------------------
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
53
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,703 Posts
Most users ever online: 677 @ 09/27/24 06:41 PM
|
|
|
|