I generate perceptions from reading but I want to ask other Outlaws if they perceive a sonic difference between the 950 and a 2-channel preamp. If my primary goal is 2-channel (but I need HT capability) will I want to add a 2-channel preamp (ie my local dealer suggested an Audio Researc SP16). I will require a phono stage.

I'm currently running a Scott 222c for music and the 1050 for HT. This may be due to my Klipsch speakers which I like a lot more with the Scott than the 1050 in 2-channel mode. For HT the SS 1050 is great.

If I bought a pair of new speakers (pick a model with list price under $5k) then would the 950 be ok for 2-channel? I wish I could have two rooms but that is not the case.

Will the RR2150 sound better than the 950/770 in 2-channel mode?

Buy a 2 channel preamp, preferrably tubed.

Last week I bought a nice fully functional Scott 355 pre-amp/tuner at an antique auction. NOSValves is checking it out and refreshing any tubes/caps/etc. If nothing else it's cool and collectible.

I'm still thinking of upgrading my 1050 to the 950 for HT pre/pro and using an Outlaw 5-channel amp along with my Dynaco for a merged HT/2-channel system. I guess it's worht the hassle?

If the Scott is anywhere near functional, it is very likely that it would crap on anything solid stage that you could buy today.

Soundhound:

I agree, The older Tube gear will probably have some nice older tubes and you should like it. After playing with it a while a whole world of tube gear is out there waiting for you. Up until a few years ago I was still buying Dynaco ST70s at yard sales and Mac 240s at estate sales. Health has shorted my hunting stability, but the older great equipment is still out there. I once bought a pair of Quad ESL 63s for $30. And the were legal, bought from the Police Department in "get rid of unclaimed items" sale.