Processor technology changes frequently so it's good to keep the same amps and have less invested in the box that goes obsolete.

Here's some ramblings...

Isn't the LINN LP12 from years ago a totally different unit other than the cosmetics? The power, the bearings, the arm, etc. Shopping for an LP12 can be complicated with all the variances. The setup also seems to require a more advanced user. I would agree this is a class TT but I'm not sure if those old units selling under $1k are as attractive as other options. They certainly don't seem to be comparable to the $2K+ newer Linns...or so I'm told.

I have a 1050 and I have totally replaced it for 2-channel with an early 1960's Scott 222c which is heaps better sounding with my Cornwalls...and oh how wonderful the phono stage. Now I still like separates so I'm getting a Scott 130 preamp and updating my ST-70 amp for more headroom.

I use the 1050 for HT center and three sourrounds. It does a fine job although it's getting a bit dated in features which is making me tempted to get a 950 and a 5-channel Outlaw amp using the DYnaco for the mains.

My perception is that the 950 for processing along with a 2-channel preamp with HT pass-through would be ideal. One can then add the amps of their choice which for me would be 2 tube amps and a 5-channel Outlaw although if I had modern less effecient speakers I'd probably go with all SS amps.

[This message has been edited by Hoots (edited June 07, 2003).]