Jeff's remarks are someting to consider however let's not forget the original question that started the thread. It isn't about an unfair comparison based on $$, it's about whether or not you actually acheive a sonic improvement by going with the 950/7100 over let's say the 1050.

Of course the cost associated with the 950/7100 will be greater. But the real question is, does the increased cost reflect the improvement in sound quality or is it SIMPLY the cost associated with producing separate units?? I've heard all about the flexibility and expandibility however, NO ONE has stated factually that in a side to side comparison, the 950/7100 sounds superior to the 1050.

In fact, based on what I've read thus far, I would be willing to bet that 90% of the people that responded to this topic, would NOT be able to hear a definite sonic improvement over the 1050 in a blind test?!