While it should be self-evident that performance matters above all, commenting on the rather anemic aesthetics doesn't mean you have made that your priority.

The technical merits and performance of the 950 will never drive a customer away - but the looks, well, that can and probably has.

From a consumer's perspective - that is their loss. But from a company's perspective, that customer is their loss. And that matters.

When a product performs three times its price *AND* looks three times its price, you truly have a remarkable product. Missing any part of the equation makes it novel at best.

I think the 950 is an excellent product - good enough that there are three clones. But aesthetically speaking - it is, IMHO, third rate.

Something tells me that if they had the "look" of a Krell, Mark Levinson, Aragon, EAD, Parasound's Halo etc.. defending its current look would be difficult. Good design (exterior) doesn't have to be expensive.

Considering the economies of scale - one would think the price increase (if necessary) would be minimal. A low price-point is one of Outlaws primary goal - and they should continue that mission.

One vote to improve the looks. The new logo is not much of an issue.




[This message has been edited by trancethereal (edited January 17, 2003).]