I thought there was a new newsletter coming out? What happened to the May and June issues???

I am wondering too. Does anybody have information on this matter?

No, but I do know that in the past they have not always put out a news letter monthly. They sometimes go 2-3 months before the writing bug hits them. I'm glad I don't have a paid subscription.

They did sent out an update to everybody on the 950 waiting list a week or so ago, so I doubt we'll see a newsletter this month.

I have my message confirming my registration for the waiting list for the 950 from 4/15/2002 and I didn't receive a message
updating me on the status. Did everyone get one in June ?

------------------
Scott Burns
Scott.Burns@Netcontech.Com

The latest newsletter states,
Also states,

I don't understand, either you have the hiss or you don't. Why then is the production and shipping being stopped if the vast majority of 950 owners haven't experienced this problem?
Then what "Problems" are they trying to solve?

I do appreciate the newsletter. I surmise that OUTLAW does have an idea on when possibly things can get rolling again and that's the information I would like to have. Signed PRE/PRO less for 5 months now.

How about bringing in an intern, or willing wait lister , to listen to the units that are in the warehouse and ship out the ones that don't hiss?

brianca.

I am all for Outlaw taking the time to resolve the issues before shipping new units. I figure, if you are willing to settle for hiss or any other form of substandard performance, why bother buying separates in the first place???

dmeister

I agree with this, however the VAST majority have apparently never had problems. If you as a company put out 100 pieces of product and have a failure rate of 1%, do you stop the production lines or do you just correct those 1% as they occur. I don't know what percentage of 950 owners have the problem, but I wouldn't consider it to be many, when they state that the "vast (IE; of great quantity or degree)majority" do not.

maybe the nature of the problem is such that they can't reliably state what the failure rate will be. In that case I think the best course of action is the one that they chose.
Obviously I'm just guessing here, but that's what we're all doing anyway, at least until they say otherwise.
Thanks

[This message has been edited by bruning1 (edited July 09, 2002).]