Outlaw Audio home shop products hideout news support about
Topic Options
#33193 - 04/28/04 05:37 PM three 200 m-blocks vs. five 200 m-blocks
tmg223 Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 04/28/04
Posts: 3
i have an ht receiver with pre amp outputs.
I want to upgrade to mono amps. I'm considering 3 amps vs. 5 amps. I was wondering if having m-block amps for the rear speakers is overkill.

Thanks,
Tom

Top
#33194 - 04/28/04 06:19 PM Re: three 200 m-blocks vs. five 200 m-blocks
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
It's possible that the M200's would be more than you need for the surrounds, but it depends on the specifics of your equipment. For example, what speakers are you using for your surrounds, and what receiver are you using? Just to keep things eternally confusing, have you considered a five-channel power amp like the 755 in place of your receiver's amps? You would get a similar performance improvement -- which is preferable depends at least somewhat on your specific situation.

------------------
gonk -- 950 Review | LFM-1 Review | Pre/Pro Comparison Chart | Saloon Links
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#33195 - 05/01/04 08:47 AM Re: three 200 m-blocks vs. five 200 m-blocks
tmg223 Offline
Deputy Gunslinger

Registered: 04/28/04
Posts: 3
Gonk thanks for the reply.
Here's the deal.
I have a cheap Sherwood HT receiver I bought about 2 years ago. I bought it because it had pre-amp outputs with idea to updgrade the amps. The surround sound speakers are low end advents. My plan is to buy either three or five m-blocks. And than later on upgrade the speakers. And than finally replace the HT receiver with the Outlaw 950.

Thanks in advance,
Tom

Top
#33196 - 05/02/04 11:45 AM Re: three 200 m-blocks vs. five 200 m-blocks
curegeorg Offline
Desperado

Registered: 11/15/03
Posts: 1012
Loc: Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
id get five, because you can do so for the price of four.
_________________________
This post has been brought to you by curegeorg, thanks for reading.

Top
#33197 - 05/07/04 10:12 AM Re: three 200 m-blocks vs. five 200 m-blocks
JT Clark Offline
Desperado

Registered: 10/25/02
Posts: 466
Loc: IL
Is there something wrong with getting a 755? Unless you're planning to spread the amps all over kingdom come I'd just get that.

Top
#33198 - 05/07/04 11:19 AM Re: three 200 m-blocks vs. five 200 m-blocks
gonk Offline
Desperado

Registered: 03/21/01
Posts: 14054
Loc: Memphis, TN USA
With the current promotion on 200's, you can get a stack of five for less than the cost of a 755. For me, there is some convenience to the single box, but there are also some benefits to monoblocks that are hard to deny -- if you have the space for all of them and are ready to add four extra power cords to your cabling snake pit, the stack of 200's would offer independent power supplies for each channel and redundancy (one channel dies, the other four are unaffected).

------------------
gonk -- 950 Review | LFM-1 Review | Pre/Pro Comparison Chart | Saloon Links
_________________________
gonk
HT Basics | HDMI FAQ | Pics | Remote Files | Art Show
Reviews: Index | 990 | speakers | BDP-93

Top
#33199 - 05/09/04 07:28 PM Re: three 200 m-blocks vs. five 200 m-blocks
JT Clark Offline
Desperado

Registered: 10/25/02
Posts: 466
Loc: IL
Hmm, yeah. That is a good deal. Defintely have to look at your priorities there. For me, I'd probably still pay the money for the 755 as I'd want the simplicity in power and stacking. But this isn't my purchase.

Top

Who's Online
0 registered (), 979 Guests and 1 Spider online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
audio123, Dustin _69c10, Dain, REP, caffeinated
8717 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
The Wyrm 3
FAUguy 2
butchgo 2
kiwiaudio 1
Forum Stats
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,708 Posts

Most users ever online: 1,171 @ Today at 03:40 AM