Regnad,
I’m no expert, and I own the 1050 not the 950, but my recent speaker configuration experience may be of some relevance to your post.
My modest speakers (Polk RM6600) were wired as yours, until about 6 weeks ago, when, I decided to try this alternative setup:
* Fronts wired directly to my receiver; set to small.
* Sub wired via LFE, with appropriate xover set on receiver.
* Surrounds and Center set to small.
My sub’s LFE input does not bypass its internal xover, so I turned it all the way up to get it out of the way of the receiver’s xover.
After a system calibration, I couldn’t believe I was listening to the same system (in fact, I don’t think I was
).
With the first setup, the front sats and center speaker did not sound “in tune" (not the right words, but don’t know how else to describe it). Compared to this new configuration, the front soundstage was almost nonexistent.
As far as I can figure, in the first setup, the receiver and sub xovers were interacting negatively. What still gets me is that I was simply following my speaker documentation with the initial setup. I think speaker manufactures assume most people not purchasing “audiophile” grade speakers won’t have a receiver with an adjustable crossover. In that scenario, this setup makes sense.
So the moral of the tale - why not give the LFE connection to the sub a try? What do you have to lose? Good luck if you decide to experiment, and let us know how it goes!
-chris