Originally posted by gonk:
...Once you include HD video switching, you enter the realm of home theater. Most people who have multiple HD sources and separate speakers are going to pursue at least some basic surround system, which is probably why we don't see stereo integrated amps with any sort of video switching. And once you go to multichannel, you introduce so much digital processing that we find ourselves far removed from the domain of the classic integrated amp.
I see your point here. My desired solution is more than what is considered the classic integrated amp. But why put a number of how many channels an integrated amp can have? Yes, it's in the realm of home theatre, but I think it would be a consumer-friendly product, function wise.
What I'm really after is a complete amplication solution that doesn't have the radio/phono/tape circuits which I consider unnecessary or redundant. Instead of spending money on those functions, throw that into the video switching. This would represent a unitary solution in one chassis, with one remote control. Maybe the best way to explain what I'm after is a Denon-quality A/V unit without the receiver. I'm sure Outlaw could make such a unit of equal quality and features. And I just gotta have the equalizer. Yep, you're right in saying it's going to make cost an issue (and the quality of most equalizers isn't good), but I really think it would be a unique and useful addition. Only Outlaw would have it! That's the secret of successful marketing; a unique selling proposition.
Thanks to all for your views!