#29271 - 01/24/04 02:40 PM
Outlaw vs. Other Amplifiers
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 01/23/04
Posts: 4
|
I will be purchasing my first separate amplifier or amplifiers in the next few of months and wanted to go ahead and start gathering info and opinions now.
My question has to do with the quality of Outlaw compared to other manufacturers. From what I have read it seems that B&K, Sunfire, ect... are considered by most to be the premier separates for HT.
How does Outlaw compare to these higher priced amps? What do they offer that Outlaw does not?
From my experience I have learned that more times than not, when you purchase anything high-end, a large percentage of the price tag is attributed to the name brand as apposed to true performance and quality improvements.
Is that the case when comparing Outlaw to other higher priced components? If cost was removed from the equation, would you still use Outlaw separates over other brands?
I know that I have thrown out some broad quetions but I have found these forums very helpful in gathering info and assisting in decision making. Please include any additional comments you consider helpful and thank you in advance.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#29272 - 01/24/04 05:01 PM
Re: Outlaw vs. Other Amplifiers
|
Desperado
Registered: 12/19/02
Posts: 427
|
Buy Outlaw - save a bundle. Solid state power amps have got to be the one component where any given amp is most likely to sound identical or nearly identical to any other. You can almost break it down to a dollars / Watt buying decision. Spend the money saved on good transducers (where there is the most difference between components) or gear with all of those extra (and more expensive) features that you've always wanted. (But then again, the Model 950 also destroys the myth that you need to spend big bucks to get a great set of features, in a top-performing package.) Better yet, spend the difference on source material and sit back and listen to it through a great-sounding and value-priced Outlaw amp.
(No I was not in any way shape or form induced to write this post on behalf of Outlaw!)
Jeff Mackwood
_________________________
Jeff Mackwood
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#29273 - 01/25/04 02:51 PM
Re: Outlaw vs. Other Amplifiers
|
Desperado
Registered: 03/20/03
Posts: 668
Loc: Maryland
|
What Jeff said. :-D
Before I purchased my Outlaw equipment, I read many reviews. In fact, it was while researching another brand that I first learned of Outlaw. I was reading a “shootout” article featuring three multi-channel amplifiers, including an Outlaw. In almost every case where the reviewer(s) have a philosophy that allows for the possibility that excellence can be found in a piece of equipment even if its purchase price doesn’t approach or cross into the five-figure range, Outlaw always compares favorably to equipment costing more, often much more. Reviews of amplifiers where there is genuine solid performance seemingly always boil down to performance numbers, nuance and reviewers’ preferences. Outlaw had the performance; I wasn’t going to pay an extra $1K, $2K, or more for processor and amplifier nuance! Note my user name? After all, I had other components to purchase where those dollars would be of greater benefit.
Still not convinced? Likely you are going to have to do what the reviewers do: compare. It might cost you a few bucks shipping or an errand to take back the amplifier you don’t keep – just chock it up as “tuition” for a learning experience. Pick one of the Outlaw amps and one of another brand with similar power you would genuinely consider purchasing. Run an A/B test in your system. (Why in your system? If the choice boils down to nuance and preference, the test better be with the other equipment your going to “live with” after your amplifier purchase.) Just make sure to use an SPL meter so that the acoustic volume in the room ends up being the same for each amp. Also, if I were doing this test and were operating subwoofer(s) separately from the speakers powered by the amps being compared, I would do the most of the comparison without the sub(s) operating. That way there is no need to adjust full-range-to-subwoofer level ratios if the amps being compared have even slightly a different overall amount of gain compared to each other or to your original amplifier section, and there will be no low frequency masking of what is happening in the rest of your system. Once you have done as much as you can without the sub(s) operating, you might go through the effort to match your sub(s) to the system with each amplifier you are considering, but that is so time consuming to do properly that it makes honest A/B comparing difficult. IMO, adding in the sub(s) is more for a final confirmation or “wow” stage of the test.
In any case, I have been thoroughly pleased with the marked difference Outlaw equipment has made to the sound of my system.
I hope you find what you’re looking for!
[This message has been edited by bestbang4thebuck (edited January 25, 2004).]
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#29274 - 01/28/04 12:00 PM
Re: Outlaw vs. Other Amplifiers
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 01/23/04
Posts: 4
|
Thanks for the replies.
Is it always this slow on the forum? Please don't take that the wrong way.
I had a couple of additional questions I would like to get your opinions on.
Is Outlaw considered a high-current amp?
Do Outlaw amplifiers pair well with high-sensitivity speakers and what brand of speakers do you use?
I had always assumed that regardless of what brand of amplifier you use, they are all basically the same. Not until I raised the question on other forums did I find that there were so many different opinions.
I will be adding amplifiers to Klipsch speakers. I have been told that because these are so sensitive, the type of amplification you use is very important. What are your thoughts?
A side-by-side comparison is a good suggestion, I will probably do that further down the road. In the interem I would like to gather as much info and opinions as possible. Thanks again.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#29276 - 01/28/04 12:46 PM
Re: Outlaw vs. Other Amplifiers
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 01/27/03
Posts: 116
Loc: San Diego, CA
|
I have seen threads on other forums where users of Klipsh speakers will bi-amp and use tubes for the high end and solid state for the mid and low end. A 5W tube amp was in one setup I read and produced enough SPL to make hurt the ear, all because the sensitivity of the horn speaker was something like 103 if I recall. You might try this set-up if your budget allows. Do some searches of the net and you should be able to find the posts/reviews.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#29277 - 01/28/04 01:18 PM
Re: Outlaw vs. Other Amplifiers
|
Desperado
Registered: 04/10/02
Posts: 1857
Loc: Gusev Crater, Mars
|
I use a 5 watt SET tube amp in my setup for the high frequency horn that has 106db/watt sensitivity. However I use a 50 watt ultra-linear tube amp for the woofer. My active crossover is at 500Hz. With even one watt, 106 db above 500Hz is extremely loud!
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#29278 - 01/28/04 04:23 PM
Re: Outlaw vs. Other Amplifiers
|
Gunslinger
Registered: 01/12/03
Posts: 47
|
I have Klipsch speakers all around except for sub which is velodyne. I currently have B&K power amps connected to my Outlaw 950. I previously had Parasound amp as well. It is my own personal opinion that my Klpisch speakers sound better with a warmer sounding amp. BTW, I have no experience with Outlaw amps and can offer no opinion on their sound quality.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#29279 - 01/29/04 12:31 PM
Re: Outlaw vs. Other Amplifiers
|
Deputy Gunslinger
Registered: 01/23/04
Posts: 4
|
Thanks for the replies.
I have the Reference line and I would like to avoid bi-amping. It was my understanding that the tube amps are mainly used with Heritage. Can anyone suggest some brands of amps to consider that are in a more reasonable price bracket?
JAMMINNJC,
Which Klipsch are you using?
Which B&K amps?
Are there any other amps you have heard with Klipsch that you would consider warm sounding?
Thanks.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#29280 - 01/29/04 02:04 PM
Re: Outlaw vs. Other Amplifiers
|
Desperado
Registered: 04/10/02
Posts: 1857
Loc: Gusev Crater, Mars
|
Originally posted by JBP: Thanks for the replies.
I have the Reference line and I would like to avoid bi-amping. It was my understanding that the tube amps are mainly used with Heritage.
Tube amps are used with any speaker where their characteristics can be put to best use. This is can be any efficient speaker, regardless of brand or model. If it is desired to have a "warm" sounding amplifier, tubes will do it. Solid state amplifiers sometimes compare their sound to that of tubes, but the only way to actually get the sound of a tube amp is with an actual tube amp, at least with what is commercially available to the consumer.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 registered (),
53
Guests and
1
Spider online. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
8,717 Registered Members
88 Forums
11,331 Topics
98,703 Posts
Most users ever online: 677 @ 09/27/24 06:41 PM
|
|
|
|